SaltyCajun.com
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

SaltyCajun.com (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Discussion (Everything Else) (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Policeman arrests firefighter rendering aid in Louisiana (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/showthread.php?t=52284)

MathGeek 03-31-2014 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goooh (Post 676699)
“Workers distracted by e-mail and phone calls suffer a fall in IQ more than twice that found in marijuana smokers.”

http://www.thenewatlantis.com/public...f-multitasking
The assertion seems fishy on its face, because of how IQ is measured in standard tests, so I've conducted a thorough scholarly search for the original scholarly publication. The trouble is that even though the Rosen quotation has been widely cited in opinion pieces and blog type stuff, the underlying study is not available. It is not clear how this purported study was performed of if Rosen just made it up, because she did not cite a scholarly source (authors, journal, title of article).

This purported email and phone call induced IQ drop, is it long-term (like with marijuana use), or is it temporarily limited to the time when one is multitasking the emails and phone calls, etc.? Science is not science at all unless the methodology, data, and results are published. This one fails the smell test. But I bet the claims fool lots of pot heads.

Clampy 03-31-2014 06:48 PM
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/du-pont-he...7.html#16nGWlb

Too bad they didn't catch this dude with a joint. If only.


Spiral Out

Duck Butter 03-31-2014 06:48 PM
[quote=southern151;676701]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck Butter (Post 676697)
There's more than is being told, here. Yep, he got life. He was deemed a career criminal. In other words this was FAR from his first time being busted for narcotic distribution.

As for the sex offender, I have no idea. Being a cop and, a child molester should make his 10 year stay in prison essentially death row.:work:
dang, I was unaware of this. I figured that weed wasn't the main thing though

Montauk17 03-31-2014 06:49 PM
http://i.qkme.me/3sujob.jpg

Goooh 03-31-2014 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathGeek (Post 676708)
The assertion seems fishy on its face, because of how IQ is measured in standard tests, so I've conducted a thorough scholarly search for the original scholarly publication. The trouble is that even though the Rosen quotation has been widely cited in opinion pieces and blog type stuff, the underlying study is not available. It is not clear how this purported study was performed of if Rosen just made it up, because she did not cite a scholarly source (authors, journal, title of article).



This purported email and phone call induced IQ drop, is it long-term (like with marijuana use), or is it temporarily limited to the time when one is multitasking the emails and phone calls, etc.? Science is not science at all unless the methodology, data, and results are published. This one fails the smell test. But I bet the claims fool lots of pot heads.

Just playing the game like you do.

So science is defined as the quoting of scientists?

Clampy 03-31-2014 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathGeek (Post 676708)
The assertion seems fishy on its face, because of how IQ is measured in standard tests, so I've conducted a thorough scholarly search for the original scholarly publication. The trouble is that even though the Rosen quotation has been widely cited in opinion pieces and blog type stuff, the underlying study is not available. It is not clear how this purported study was performed of if Rosen just made it up, because she did not cite a scholarly source (authors, journal, title of article).



This purported email and phone call induced IQ drop, is it long-term (like with marijuana use), or is it temporarily limited to the time when one is multitasking the emails and phone calls, etc.? Science is not science at all unless the methodology, data, and results are published. This one fails the smell test. But I bet the claims fool lots of pot heads.

What's sad is do to his squareness all his cool colleagues who burn never let him know so he never met a person who he looked up to who was a toker so his perception is a little off.


Spiral Out

MathGeek 03-31-2014 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goooh (Post 676713)
Just playing the game like you do.

So science is defined as the quoting of scientists?
Science is publishing a full methodology along with the data so that experiments can be properly interpreted verified by independent sources.

You posted nothing but an anonymous quote out of context. Meaningless.

Matt G 03-31-2014 08:59 PM
The real "drug" that is affecting people's IQ is Facebook. Ban that sheet! I see people with MBA's and CPA licenses who sound like their straight out of that stupid movie "Clueless" when it comes to Facebook.

MathGeek 03-31-2014 09:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt G (Post 676780)
The real "drug" that is affecting people's IQ is Facebook. Ban that sheet! I see people with MBA's and CPA licenses who sound like their straight out of that stupid movie "Clueless" when it comes to Facebook.
At USAFA, we had a data analysis problem in the math class presenting data for IQ vs. weekly hours on Facebook.

southern151 03-31-2014 09:02 PM
[quote=Duck Butter;676710]
Quote:
Originally Posted by southern151 (Post 676701)

dang, I was unaware of this. I figured that weed wasn't the main thing though
No, weed was likely the only thing he distributed that I wouldn't have a problem with. If my memory serves me right(:confused:), he'd been away for multiple kilos of cocaine prior. I looked for links but, cannot find them. I remember hearing of him on the news last year or, in '12 though. He wasn't the "innocent herb dealer."

bgizzle 03-31-2014 09:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathGeek (Post 676773)
Science is publishing a full methodology along with the data so that experiments can be properly interpreted verified by independent sources.

You posted nothing but an anonymous quote out of context. Meaningless.
To you


"Go ahead, share your opinion! I won't cry"

Goooh 03-31-2014 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathGeek (Post 676773)
Science is publishing a full methodology along with the data so that experiments can be properly interpreted verified by independent sources.



You posted nothing but an anonymous quote out of context. Meaningless.

Exactly.

Just like everything you post about cannabis. You love you some anecdotes

OnePunchRex 03-31-2014 09:56 PM
Mathgeek, S T F U, you just look stupid.

MathGeek 03-31-2014 10:28 PM
How's the saying go?

When you have the facts, argue the facts.

When you have the law, argue the law.

When you have neither, attack your opponent.

duckman1911 03-31-2014 10:44 PM
[quote=southern151;676701]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck Butter (Post 676697)
There's more than is being told, here. Yep, he got life. He was deemed a career criminal. In other words this was FAR from his first time being busted for narcotic distribution.

As for the sex offender, I have no idea. Being a cop and, a child molester should make his 10 year stay in prison essentially death row.:work:
As far as your last sentence. WE CAN ONLY HOPE.

DannyI 03-31-2014 10:50 PM
True dat Geek, only true acceptable methodology, approved calibrated instrumentation that meets approved SQC criteria, is acceptable data, all other is considered nonsense whether it's in petroleum, health & sciences, etc.

OnePunchRex 04-01-2014 07:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathGeek (Post 676828)
How's the saying go?

When you have the facts, argue the facts.

When you have the law, argue the law.

When you have neither, attack your opponent.
Dude, you eat gafftop, not attacking you - just stating the obvious. You're not my opponent, you are too much of a mental midget to rise to that status.

Nickt87 04-01-2014 08:40 AM
[quote=southern151;676701]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck Butter (Post 676697)
There's more than is being told, here. Yep, he got life. He was deemed a career criminal. In other words this was FAR from his first time being busted for narcotic distribution.

As for the sex offender, I have no idea. Being a cop and, a child molester should make his 10 year stay in prison essentially death row.:work:
Yea, he was a repeat offender. And no I don't neccesarily disagree with putting repeaters away for life, but I do disagree with putting a guy with a couple grocery bags of weed away for life and then letting your ******cking buddy off the hook and giving him 10 years for raping and molesting his neice.

Clampy 04-01-2014 09:04 AM
The system is awesome.

Get popped once for drugs.
Goes on record
Can't get a job cuz you are a convicted druggie

Society says to rehabilitate but you can't get a job now so what are they supposed to do I guess go back to what they were doing and pray not to get caught.
The system perpetuates itself and keeps nice nonviolent offenders behind bars for prison labor. I mean who would you want cleaning up roads and stuff like that the inmates do. Murders or Johnny that got caught with dime bag ?


Spiral Out

Duck Butter 04-01-2014 09:12 AM
[quote=Nickt87;676871]
Quote:
Originally Posted by southern151 (Post 676701)

Yea, he was a repeat offender. And no I don't neccesarily disagree with putting repeaters away for life, but I do disagree with putting a guy with a couple grocery bags of weed away for life and then letting your ******cking buddy off the hook and giving him 10 years for raping and molesting his neice.

for the record, that was southern that said this I got tangled up in this quote somehow but I agree


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - [ARG:3 UNDEFINED], Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
All content, images, designs, and logos are Copyright © 2009-2012,
Salty Cajun, LLC
No unathorized use is permitted