The ones who are going to get this done are not on Saltycajun.com ...

That might not be the case, I wouldn't burn any bridges.

the more people you have behind you means the more support you have

including you???

:shaking::shaking::shaking::shaking::shaking:

good one lmao

I think the question now for SaltyCajun's, is who would be in favor of a 5 year impact study of a 25 limit for trout on Big Lake.... this also could be put in a poll....I just don't know how to do it.

If you do not need our members and do care what anywhere here has to say then stop wasting our time and bandwith. Strength is in numbers, if you want to throw your middle finger at our 6,000 members it probably will not help your cause.

You said it yourself, you need politicians and a ton of money to make a change at the top. Hope you are a resourceful person...

You nailed it....

Agreed, and having thousands of people supporting you (saltycajun) would probably not hurt since most people here are registered voters, tax payers and or members of various organizations. But hey, he doesn't need us good luck to him.

Not to mention a majority of the people on the site fish big lake....well on weekends

many people under estimate those of us with skinny arms.

as you grow older and wiser, you will, with any luck, become aware of guys that have skinny arms, and deep pockets.

Sometimes, in fact most all times, not with standing high school, machoism is way over rated.

w a little food for thought there is a common factor between office fishermen and real fishermen


THEY ARE BOTH FISHERMEN

From what I have seen,the most likely person to possibly get anything done don't even live here but instead of making worthless insults has posted very good information and also SEEMS LEVEL HEAD AND COOL TEMPERED

until w conforms him into a club w member

Sure hope the fella is smarter then that. I think if you sent Mathgeek and Ratdog to fight this you would really have a chance of getting somewhere.

W do you really see how much you flip flop? Seriously?:shaking: Its absolutely comical that you do not see this

All that has been 'proofed' here is that

1. W is an egomaniac
2. Nothing has been proven
3. Refer to number 1



W should take his one follower and start a website:grinpimp::rotfl:

easy on the pound guys........."W" passion is strongly needed in games like this.
But he looses all credibility with reasonable people when he insults just for the sake of the insult.

In trying to find a nugget of goodness, "W's" passion is what it is.

I can take a passionate argument and make some thing of it, other than a accimilator

W stay the course, just not with the hammer down.
seek facts. In GOD I trust and I trust me second, everyone else needs to show me the facts.........all of them.

Studies involving wildlife management can not technically be proven, that is why words such as 'suggests' and 'further studies needed', are used and why words such as 'proves' can not be used, because there are so many variables to consider and each population is different.
I can not 'prove' this but I would venture to say that the limit change from 25 to 15 has ZERO effect on the trout population (numbers, size, health, fecundity, etc.) of Big Lake. Recreational fishermen put hardly a dent in the population of a species such as trout. I would also venture to say that an increase from 15 even up to 50 would have such a small effect it would not matter.