Lmao.....that was the single greatest comment I've read on this site in a long time. The animosity, the intensity. Good stuff.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I847 using Tapatalk 2

:thefinger::thefinger::thefinger::thefinger:

Big E Smalls you know people can make data say anyting, with that being said go to Cox Bay, California Bay, American Bay, these bays are really just open water. The good effects of the Bohemia diversion is so localize to the canal leading to the struture shows some gain, but the bays and marsh this project was suppose to help, it has done little to nothing for the bays listed above.

Yes, I do know people can make data say anything, but that map is pretty black and white to me. That map specifically shows that land loss in the Bohemia Spillway was minimal compared to other areas. That to me seems like a successful project. Add in that, based on the linked document below, it was never specified that sediment diversion to those bays listed was the goal. Sure, the edge of the project boundary included parts of some bays, but they are never specifically mentioned as management objectives.

Now, in terms of restoration, it would be beneficial to target those bays with that diversion. But, I don't see that that was ever the intention. I may be wrong on that, just going by what I have read from an agency that had oversight on that project. The Bohemia Spillway itself was never intended as a wetland restoration project, but as a means to protect New Orleans from flooding.

Now, again, that being said, there are some large scale diversions planned in that area. Not saying they are going to work, because its all about the science and planning that goes into it.


sonris-www.dnr.state.la.us/dnrservices/redirectUrl.jsp?dID=3903862

(may have to copy and paste link into search bar.)

Side note: If Biggie Smalls had a mini me, would he be called Min E Smalls? Idk, just a thought.

but it didn't hurt them either? 1 acre gain > 100 acres lost:)