Yeah I wish I could say it was better. Btw it's an FX4 with 3.5.5 gears and 20" rims for those who want to compare.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Btw straight interstate @ 70 and no wind you can keep your mileage right around 20mpg with this truck, but who really does that. That was at 70 from Opelousas to I10 Attachment 66809 |
Quote:
|
Just got out of my 2nd Z71 and bought the 5.0 Ford this past December. The ride is awesome and more quiet inside cab. So many more options in the base packages than GM. Cab is way bigger, love the tailgate step, 36 gal gas tank, and back up camera available on the XLT models. Pulls every bit of as good as the 5.3 IMO with similar mpg. MPG on interstate is 17/18 going 75, in town 14. Someone mentioned 20 MPG on the highway. Is that with a chip or is that going 55? Love it so far just hope it last.
|
Man this thread has got me thinking there is something seriously wrong with my Silverado. Y'all are spouting out some amzing MPGs compared to what I get. I filled up a couple days ago and I had averaged 11.3. That's driving 10 miles round trip to work where I only have 3 stop lights/signs. Hook something to it, and you can pretty much throw double digits out of the window.
|
Might be time for a tune up
Spiral Out |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm able to get 22 with my 5.7L running about 74. |
If you interested in ford, the 5.0 and ecoboost engines are both fine engines, and each has its advantages and disadvantages. Ford should not have label the 3.5 as "ecoboost". If you look at the mpg rating the ecoboost only has a 1mpg advantage over the 5.0. I also believe the 21mpg the ecoboost supposedly gets it with a standard extended cab with 17 wheels.
I have the screw ecoboost, 3.55 gears and 4x4. Highway driving (70mph or less) i get 20-23mpg. Driving in lafayette with all the stop and go i get around 14. Average getting 18. Pulling a 19' bayboat with no headwind about 11-12 @70mph. What kills the mpgs on the eco is headwinds and stop and gos. The 5.0 makes its torque in the upper rpms and will downshift more while towing across incline, while the eco makes its max torque around 3000rpm, which is more usable for towing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
2013. 24' cc. It's definitley a nice truck. Plenty of power. Unless the ball hitch is occupied |
What gas mileage u getting while towing?
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
5-6 mpg
|
The gas mileage doesn't bother me. I have a truck and it drinks gas and I knew that before I bought it. I'm talking about how this thing searches for gears and acts like a pissed off weedeater when I hook up to the boat
|
Quote:
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk |
I have the tundra also and get 10 plus mpg pulling my 24 bay boat 70-75
|
Im just waiting to see whats going to happen with this durango
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Lol
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk |
Let's just say if you hypothetically left the frontier hooked to it and it slips in neutral at I dunno maybe ..... Rotary Point
Insurance could cover that ;) Spiral Out |
Lol
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk |
After extensive research (you tube videos) I have learned that my truck sucks at towing, just not as much as Gm and ram. Still up in the air on ford.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - [ARG:3 UNDEFINED], Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
All content, images, designs, and logos are Copyright © 2009-2012,
Salty Cajun, LLC
No unathorized use is permitted