SaltyCajun.com

Page 4 of 7

Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

SaltyCajun.com (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/index.php)

- General Discussion (Everything Else) (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)

- - Syria (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/showthread.php?t=47387)

"W"	08-28-2013 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcjaredsandwich (Post 622392)

Syria IS NOT OUR PROBLEM OR OUR RESPONSIBILITY

Where have u been?? Everything is our problem!!

We will always have war and as long as we keep our foot on the enemy'
s throat we will not have to worry about having a war on our land

But Jessie Jackson and Brother Al are really trying to start one

Goooh

08-28-2013 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Msucowpoke51 (Post 622389)

I agree with this 100%, if it were possible, but unfortunately our country is run by a bunch of p u s sies, and that will never change

Are you considering folks who say we stay out of it a bunch of p u s s I e s?

Also, can you tell me how the person you quoted came up with "roughly a month" for a valid timeline to his plan? Is that how long it would take to slaughter Egypt, Syria, Turkey, Russia, South Korea, Iran, CHINA, etc...??? Then just plant a flag and call it our right?

Maybe I misunderstood something, or maybe neither of you have a clue what the implications are.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

mcjaredsandwich

08-28-2013 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W" (Post 622399)

Let's see..

A country that a majority of us give ZERO f*cks about just killed a bunch of muslims (without a single American killed or a single tax payer dollar used in that process).

Without google, show me on a map where Syria is.

But here we are, trillions in debt and about to go deeper. Most of all, China will most likely ally itself with Russia. Russia will side with Syria.

Not to mention the media played up the tensions already with Russia regarding the Snowden deal.

So Waltrip in case you are missing my point, we are by-passing the U.N. to go help some damn country where they hate us. And involvement will be like this...

Attack Syria
Russia joins Syria
G.B. and France join U.S.
China joins Iran, Russia and Syria.

You're still of Draft age, right?

Goooh

08-28-2013 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W" (Post 622399)

We don't have wars, we have occupations. We sit and police places and hold their hand for decades.

We are just squatters borrowing ammo money from china.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

Goooh

08-28-2013 07:14 PM

http://mrwgifs.com/wp-content/upload...action-Gif.gif

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

Msucowpoke51

08-28-2013 07:42 PM

Goooh, I would've quoted you but I haven't figured out how to quote on tapatalk since the upgrade lol .. I'm not calling the ones who are against getting involved p u s sies, Im one of the ones who don't think we should get involved

What I meant was I agree with the way purple back said it should be handled, but I know it will never happen as long as politicians are calling the shots on the battlefield (that's who I was referring to) therefore I think we should stay out of it

Msucowpoke51

08-28-2013 07:46 PM

Syria

Also, I know exactly what the implications are that's why I think we should stay out if it .. I think it would be one of the worst things for our country right now

It's my fault, I said agree 100%, and after rereading, I don't agree 100% .. I agreed to another part of the post, but I don't agree that it would take a month to slaughter all terrorism and I don't agree that we should take over other countries and call it ours

Sorry for the confusion

AceArcher

08-28-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Purple Back (Post 622289)

All good valid points, but I did not dismiss a potential enemy as "not being worth a pimple on our azz". That was someone else.

And I did not say that we need to wage war on them, I said unfortunately that if we do nothing, it will eventually spill over into the US.

I believe you take me for an individual that believes we should engage in the same tactics as our previous engagements. My belief is exact opposite, we should engage first, yes, but do it with muscle and make an example that the US is no longer a bunch of p u s sies. We should go in and slaughter all who are associated with terrosists organizations. It would take roughly a month. Then pull our troops back to the US. Then dare any terrosist group to organize and make the same mistake. If it were done in this manner, it would not cost the US but a fraction of the normal cost associated.

Jeez man i was giving you a ration of Shizz because you were advocating us starting another world war. Based on what your saying above you sound halfway reasonable. Can you make up your mind... :) lol

I think i do get what your saying though, basically it seems to me like your saying that we should stop with these BS political wars, yet if there is ever call for a real conflict we should get it on like donkey kong. (or however you want to put it)

AceArcher

08-28-2013 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W" (Post 622399)

I don't remember actually seeing an answer from you on this or not... Do you think we should be involved or not.

And do you actually believe we should have continual war? or are you just saying that's the way it is?

AceArcher

08-28-2013 08:20 PM

I would love to hear from some of the 8 who voted "go to war" i am curious to understand their reasoning for intervening, Is it purely for humanitarian reasons or are other factors involved.

mcjaredsandwich

08-28-2013 08:22 PM

http://25.media.tumblr.com/73562ee3b...wsl8o1_500.gif

Hold onto your butts!

Goooh

08-28-2013 08:24 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Attachment 55158

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

Montauk17

08-28-2013 08:32 PM

https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.n...58815931_n.jpg

duckman1911

08-28-2013 08:35 PM

I agree at least partially with pretty much everyone. No I didnt have time to read every single line of every post but this is my take on it. We get all of our guys and girls home. Our president (when we have one) makes a world wide news brief that we will stay out of every country militarily and monetarialy as long as we are left alone but if we are attacked in any way the country that is responsible will no longer exist on planet earth within 24 hours. If you attack us you all die. No questions asked.

"W"	08-28-2013 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AceArcher (Post 622423)

I think we should air strike them hard for a week and just stop!!!

WWRD????

What would Regan Do

Goooh

08-28-2013 08:47 PM

One good thing about Obama and bush.... They have worked together to make libertarianism a very attractive option to a whole mess of people that dismissed it in the past.

LMAO

GUBMENT RIGHT AIN'T MUCH DIFFERENT THAN GUBMENT LEFT

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

duckman1911

08-28-2013 08:56 PM

True that Gooh. There arent many things I dont have a Libertarian on but there are some things. Drugs being about the only one

rustyb

08-28-2013 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Montauk17 (Post 622430)

https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.n...58815931_n.jpg

duckman1911

08-28-2013 09:02 PM

Libertarian view point on. Dang screen is too small on my phone.lol

Montauk17

08-28-2013 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W" (Post 622434)

I think we should air strike them hard for a week and just stop!!!

WWRD????

What would Regan Do

Finally an intelligent comment :spineyes:

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Page 4 of 7

Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - [ARG:3 UNDEFINED], Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
All content, images, designs, and logos are Copyright © 2009-2012,
Salty Cajun, LLC
No unathorized use is permitted