bbbbbbutttt it was evil guns and "hi" cap mags!!
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_16...e-sources-say/
Law enforcement sources say Adam Lanza was motivated by violent video games and a strong desire to kill more people than another infamous mass murderer. Sources say Lanza saw himself as being in direct competition with Anders Breivik, a Norwegian man who killed 77 people in July 2011. A look back at the Norway massacre Violent video games and mass violence a complex link Breivik killed eight with a bombing in downtown Oslo. He then moved to a nearby island where hunted down and fatally shot 69 people, mostly teenagers attending a summer camp. Two officials who have been briefed on the Newtown, Conn., investigation say Lanza wanted to top Breivik's death toll and targeted nearby Sandy Hook Elementary School because it was the "easiest target" with the "largest cluster of people." Newtown victim's family raises money for autism Newtown mother: Lanza home a "black spot" in neighborhood Evidence shows that his mind, sources say, Lanza was also likely acting out the fantasies of a video game as he killed 20 first graders and six adults at the school. For Lanza, the deaths apparently amounted to some kind of "score." But Lanza ended his killing spree sooner than he intended. Unlike Breivik, who surrendered, Lanza killed himself as police closed in. Just before his suicide, Lanza fired some shots at police in the school's parking lot. Officials have not publicly revealed what led them to the motive, but sources say investigators have found evidence Lanza was obsessed with Breivik. They've also recovered what they called a "trove" of video games from the basement of Lanza's home. Sources say Lanza spent countless hours there alone, in a private gaming room with the windows blacked out, honing his computer shooting skills. Lanza also made multiple visits to nearby gun ranges with his mother, Nancy Lanza, where they practiced together with actual weapons. Three guns, all registered to Nancy Lanza, were used in the Sandy Hook massacre. Lanza used a fourth weapon to kill his mother before his attack on the school. |
that mom in the video said it right
The Government can't come in my house and turn it off! Only I can do that! Big Government is getting out of hand and who the hell can keep up with all the dumbazz laws they pass daily Government don't control you , your kids or your life! Only you as parents can control your kids actions , as you are 100% responsible for their actions unit the age of 18 |
I would back regulations on video games 100%, The games we played when I was younger were nothing like what we have now and there were alot less video game soldiers loading up on guns...put ya kids outside!
|
I heard Louisiana passed a law where it's illegal to have your trailer hitch/ball on bumper when not towing.
|
Quote:
Parenting is where it lies, and even if they are banned all together you won't stop people from playing them or getting them. So, it's the parents obligation to teach some GD moderation to their kids. People were messed up before video games. What did Charles Manson play? How about Nero? Which video game did he play? Hitler, which one? Mussolini? Bin Laden? Heck, they don't even have video games when they're growing up! |
I agree its alot with parenting I should have included that...I still think some of the games are a bit out of hand and marketed towards teens..
|
Quote:
More regs never work, it just makes the people close to those that were lost feel better. Look at TSA, ain't nobody safer. |
Quote:
^^^^^ THIS^^^^^ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You laugh but there really are stupid laws like this.... Google stupid laws " like you can't scratch your azz in a burger king from.8am to 7pm" |
Hiccuping in public... Illegal
Can still get hung in Times Square for cattle rustling. Searched em on a drunken night at da camp in gc |
|
They still our money through BS taxes and we don't do a thing...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How about Stole? |
I figure a dumbass cop hit his knee on someones receiver and they made this law.
|
They always say "no such thing as a sure bet in life". Well, I disagree with that and unfortunately I was proven right just a few minutes ago with another criminal killing 3 in a 25 minute crime spree in Cali.
On duty, I carry a .40 Glock fully loaded and 2 spare magazines on my duty rig, I have a Remington 870 with mag extension loaded with buckshot and slugs, and in the same case I carry a AR-15 with 250 rounds of ammo total. I also carry an ammo can with less than lethal 12ga rounds and door breacher rounds in my unit at all times. Now, if we go out for a special operation call/warrant, I carry my Sig .45 and sometimes I carry a 37mm bean bag gun, depending on the situation. I do not carry this arsenal to look tuff, or try to intimidate people. I carry it to meet or exceed the force of my enemy - the everyday criminal. These weapons are not carried to address law abiding citizens, the hard working man/woman trying to raise a family. They are there for the mentally unstable, crazy mofo's that seem to be on every corner. I can promise you that the only sure bet in America is more crazy people will continue to kill people. Weather with a gun, and sword, a bomb, a car, fire, a knife, or baseball bat...........criminals and mentally unstable people are around us. As one man said, I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy. The liberals are doing what they do best and they have an agenda. Unfortunately, we will be having this fight for some time and crazy people with violent video games will continue to kill innocent victims. Welcome to the new society - just remember, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun! - Where's yours!? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thank you!!!!!!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Funny how they always let her go when they realize shes not a drug smuggler can you say "profiling?" |
and by "her" in the previous post I mean my wife haha ma bad
|
i know we have totally hijacked this thread but one more question for our local officer:
Would my tailgate being down be considered and obstruction? |
Nope^
|
Guy I work with said they wouldn't inspect his truck until he took his hitch out
|
And that surprises you???? Most of them places can't read or write!
|
This is the problem with liberals pushing gun control...they are idoits.
http://www.bayoushooter.com/forums/s...g-door-to-door. One of the major gun-control efforts in Olympia this session calls for the sheriff to inspect the homes of assault-weapon owners. The bill’s backers say that was a mistake. Forget police drones flying over your house. How about police coming inside, once a year, to have a look around? As Orwellian as that sounds, it isn’t hypothetical. The notion of police home inspections was introduced in a bill last week in Olympia. That it’s part of one of the major gun-control efforts pains me. It seemed in recent weeks lawmakers might be headed toward some common-sense regulation of gun sales. But then last week they went too far. By mistake, they claim. But still too far. “They always say, we’ll never go house to house to take your guns away. But then you see this, and you have to wonder.” That’s no gun-rights absolutist talking, but Lance Palmer, a Seattle trial lawyer and self-described liberal who brought the troubling Senate Bill 5737 to my attention. It’s the long-awaited assault-weapons ban, introduced last week by three Seattle Democrats. (Note to readers: The link above is to a new version of SB 5737, which no longer contains the disputed provision. The original version of the bill has been erased from the state’s Web site, but here you can see it as it was proposed.) Responding to the Newtown school massacre, the bill would ban the sale of semi-automatic weapons that use detachable ammunition magazines. Clips that contain more than 10 rounds would be illegal. But then, with respect to the thousands of weapons like that already owned by Washington residents, the bill says this: “In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall ... safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.” In other words, come into homes without a warrant to poke around. Failure to comply could get you up to a year in jail. “I’m a liberal Democrat — I’ve voted for only one Republican in my life,” Palmer told me. “But now I understand why my right-wing opponents worry about having to fight a government takeover.” He added: “It’s exactly this sort of thing that drives people into the arms of the NRA.” I have been blasting the NRA for its paranoia in the gun-control debate. But Palmer is right — you can’t fully blame them, when cops going door-to-door shows up in legislation. I spoke to two of the sponsors. One, Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, a lawyer who typically is hyper-attuned to civil-liberties issues, said he did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on. “I made a mistake,” Kline said. “I frankly should have vetted this more closely.” That lawmakers sponsor bills they haven’t read is common. Still, it’s disappointing on one of this political magnitude. Not counting a long table, it’s only an eight-page bill. The prime sponsor, Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, also condemned the search provision in his own bill, after I asked him about it. He said Palmer is right that it’s probably unconstitutional. “I have to admit that shouldn’t be in there,” Murray said. He said he came to realize that an assault-weapons ban has little chance of passing this year anyway. So he put in this bill more as “a general statement, as a guiding light of where we need to go.” Without sweating all the details. Later, a Senate Democratic spokesman blamed unnamed staff and said a new bill will be introduced. Murray had alluded at a gun-control rally in January that progress on guns could take years. “We will only win if we reach out and continue to change the hearts and minds of Washingtonians,” Murray said. “We can attack them, or start a dialogue.” Good plan, very bad start. What’s worse, the case for the perfectly reasonable gun-control bills in Olympia just got tougher. |
just gonna keep them coming:
Reuters) - U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's advice for self-defense: Buy a shotgun, not an assault rifle. Biden, who is spearheading a push for President Barack Obama's gun control proposals, dispensed this off-the-cuff tip for protecting life and property during an online question-and-answer session on Facebook on Tuesday. The vice president has not one but two shotguns that he says he keeps in a locked cabinet at his house in his home state of Delaware, and he has given his wife, Jill, explicit instructions on how to deal with any would-be intruder. "We live in an area that's wooded and secluded," Biden said. "I said, Jill, if there's ever a problem just walk out on the balcony here ... put that double-barreled shotgun and fire two blasts outside the house." "I promise you whoever's coming in is not gonna," Biden said. "You don't need an AR-15 (assault rifle). It's harder to aim. It's harder to use and in fact you don't need 30 rounds to protect yourself." "Buy a shotgun," he said, lowering his voice almost to whisper. The vice president, who is known for sometimes telling long, personal stories in his public appearances, is pushing Obama's plan for curbing gun violence following the December school shooting massacre in Newtown, Connecticut. But some of the proposals, including a ban on the sale of assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips, have run into stiff opposition from the influential U.S. gun lobby and their advocates on Capitol Hill. |
i'll keep it going with an ar15 stopping a robbery
& |
Quote:
|
|
<iframe src='http://widget.newsinc.com/single.html?WID=1&VID=24453920&freewheel=69016&sit esection=breitbart&w=440&h=336' height='336' width='440' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' marginwidth='0' marginheight='0'></iframe>
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - [ARG:3 UNDEFINED], Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
All content, images, designs, and logos are Copyright © 2009-2012,
Salty Cajun, LLC
No unathorized use is permitted