| Goooh |
06-15-2016 07:52 PM |
CCA is at it Again
How many trout are there in big lake?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goooh
(Post 798375)
How many trout are there in big lake?
|
Under 12inchs
About the same numbers as Obama Debt
|
| Goooh |
06-16-2016 07:23 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by "W"
(Post 798386)
Under 12inchs
About the same numbers as Obama Debt
|
That's impressive, does the population grow at the same rate?
|
| wishin i was fishin |
06-16-2016 07:39 AM |
Que?
|
| ratherbefishing186 |
06-16-2016 08:36 AM |
What ya talking about willis?
|
| Goooh |
06-16-2016 09:39 AM |
I'm curious about population of speckled trout in big lake, I used CCA in the subject as click bait...
|
| ratherbefishing186 |
06-16-2016 10:45 AM |
LMAO! Well played sir!
|
| meaux fishing |
06-16-2016 04:37 PM |
CCA is at it Again
At this moment or generally? I'd bet the numbers are down throughout the lake with all the fresh water
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goooh
(Post 798426)
That's impressive, does the population grow at the same rate?
|
Since the limit change from 2006 the over all size increase has taking a toll
Too many trout and not enough being taken out causes over population of mini trout
|
| CorkieB |
06-16-2016 10:11 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by meaux fishing
(Post 798462)
At this moment or generally? I'd bet the numbers are down throughout the lake with all the fresh water
|
Im curious to know how these last two years of flooding have affected BL and sabine. BL doesn't have as big of a water shed as sabine because of two big rivers and toledo bend getting pumped into the sabine river but I would think if nothing else it would hurt the oysters on the top ends for sure. Only time will tell.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
|
| Goooh |
06-17-2016 05:27 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by "W"
(Post 798471)
Since the limit change from 2006 the over all size increase has taking a toll
Too many trout and not enough being taken out causes over population of mini trout
|
Does his hold true and explain the high number of pickles in other areas where the limits are higher, like Dularge and Venice? And if you move west into Texas where limits are even lower than Big Lake why are their trout so bigger on average?
|
| DaPointIsDaBomb |
06-17-2016 05:49 AM |
I'm guessing all those weirs are open since all this rain we have had. Them having to swim against that current makes them skinny and then the limit being 15 instead of 25 makes a pickle paradise
|
| jpd0144 |
06-17-2016 10:22 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaPointIsDaBomb
(Post 798486)
I'm guessing all those weirs are open since all this rain we have had. Them having to swim against that current makes them skinny and then the limit being 15 instead of 25 makes a pickle paradise
|
I'm thinking that when the trout spawned they must have had too many small shells in the area and while fanning their beds it caused a lot of abrasions on them. This put the fish at high stress levels during this time which resulted in stunted growth of the new fry ...
|
| Armand16 |
06-17-2016 10:23 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goooh
(Post 798485)
Does his hold true and explain the high number of pickles in other areas where the limits are higher, like Dularge and Venice? And if you move west into Texas where limits are even lower than Big Lake why are their trout so bigger on average?
|
Good question. Even though the estuaries are different im going to go with pressure.
|
| seachaser250 |
06-17-2016 11:03 AM |
Give me some numbers and I'll go find out how many trout are in big lake.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
| DaPointIsDaBomb |
06-17-2016 11:21 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd0144
(Post 798513)
I'm thinking that when the trout spawned they must have had too many small shells in the area and while fanning their beds it caused a lot of abrasions on them. This put the fish at high stress levels during this time which resulted in stunted growth of the new fry ...
|
The fish are probably all over 12", but the fanning is shortening their tails
|
| meaux fishing |
06-18-2016 09:53 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goooh
(Post 798485)
Does his hold true and explain the high number of pickles in other areas where the limits are higher, like Dularge and Venice? And if you move west into Texas where limits are even lower than Big Lake why are their trout so bigger on average?
|
Plenty of big trout in Venice
|
| CorkieB |
06-18-2016 08:16 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by meaux fishing
(Post 798581)
Plenty of big trout in Venice
|
Catches of Big trout (7+lbs) are down on the east side in historically big trout locations like venice and ponchichrain. They are definitely better than average still but the number of truly big trout being taken from those places are not what they were 10-15 years ago.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
|
| CorkieB |
06-18-2016 08:30 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goooh
(Post 798485)
Does his hold true and explain the high number of pickles in other areas where the limits are higher, like Dularge and Venice? And if you move west into Texas where limits are even lower than Big Lake why are their trout so bigger on average?
|
The bays in texas (with the exception of baffin and the laguna madre) and louisiana that historically produce big trout all have one thing in common. They have decent size rivers that feed them and have large marshes that surround them. I know that doesn't answer the question but it is a fact that isn't discussed when talking about the trout population of a given location that may be the answer.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
|
| keakar |
06-20-2016 08:21 PM |
mathgeek has given all this info and fully explained it several times over in several threads (and sometimes in very scientific detail).
lower limits reduce the overall size of the fish because there are more fish consuming the finite amount of forage food sources. everywhere limits are lowered the numbers of fish increase and the size decreases accordingly.
the only exceptions to these "rules" is where the forage food sources are so plentiful as to fully absorb a doubling or tripling of fish populations feeding on them.
ask mathgeek if you need to know more about it
|
| Goooh |
06-20-2016 08:40 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by keakar
(Post 798784)
mathgeek has given all this info and fully explained it several times over in several threads (and sometimes in very scientific detail).
lower limits reduce the overall size of the fish because there are more fish consuming the finite amount of forage food sources. everywhere limits are lowered the numbers of fish increase and the size decreases accordingly.
the only exceptions to these "rules" is where the forage food sources are so plentiful as to fully absorb a doubling or tripling of fish populations feeding on them.
ask mathgeek if you need to know more about it Inshore Saltwater Fishing Discussion: Trout Limits and Population - SaltyCajun.com
|
Thanks, I'm new to the forum and had no idea Math Geek was the only person on it that could speak to the subject.
|
| keakar |
06-21-2016 06:05 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goooh
(Post 798788)
Thanks, I'm new to the forum and had no idea Math Geek was the only person on it that could speak to the subject.
|
I didn't see you quoted or even mentioned in my post nor did I say "Math Geek was the only person on it that could speak to the subject" but he is very educated about it and maybe you don't want facts or actual hard data bothering your thinking, but others at this site may want to learn more about the subject rather then just post things for click bait
|
| Goooh |
06-22-2016 06:11 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by keakar
(Post 798880)
I didn't see you quoted or even mentioned in my post nor did I say "Math Geek was the only person on it that could speak to the subject" but he is very educated about it and maybe you don't want facts or actual hard data bothering your thinking, but others at this site may want to learn more about the subject rather then just post things for click bait
|
You put a link to my thread, which has a post from math geek that has no data in it.
|
| chief paul |
06-22-2016 07:43 AM |
we can help !
Quote:
Originally Posted by "W"
(Post 798471)
Since the limit change from 2006 the over all size increase has taking a toll
Too many trout and not enough being taken out causes over population of mini trout
|
Will help take some out if you tell us where and how...always glad to
help when I can. lol
|
| MEM1971 |
06-28-2016 12:46 PM |
Numbers way up and size way down
|
| evis102 |
07-01-2016 05:25 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEM1971
(Post 799542)
Numbers way up and size way down
|
That is not a totally accurate statement. There are big fish out there but I believe fishing pressure is the biggest cause for the lack of numbers being caught.
|
| MEM1971 |
07-02-2016 07:11 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by evis102
(Post 799790)
That is not a totally accurate statement. There are big fish out there but I believe fishing pressure is the biggest cause for the lack of numbers being caught.
|
Has been for me.
|
| Roseaux |
07-02-2016 10:33 PM |
All the douche bags that wear buffs and Columbia fishing shirts are the reason the trout numbers are down, a lot of it is obamas fault also.
Once trump is elected the trout population will thrive again. #makeBigLakeGreatAgain
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - [ARG:3 UNDEFINED], Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
All content, images, designs, and logos are Copyright © 2009-2012,
Salty Cajun, LLC
No unathorized use is permitted