Originally Posted by BuckingFastard (Post 707185)

What if Rex is actually "w"

MIND BLOWN:fireworks::beathorse:

Originally Posted by noodle creek (Post 707189)

Let me go ahead and tell yall how absolutely f***ing stupid the triple tail limit is. Caught 43 the other day, 3 were keepers. It's about equivalent to saying you can only keep a trout 6 lbs or bigger. What's even better is when we got back to spicers and the wildlife and fisheries biologist was taking surveys, we told him we didn't catch sh** because of their stupid triple tail limit. He was so quick to shut us down and say "woahh hold up, it was soley CCA that pushed for that." He then went on to say that there is nowhere near enough data to have a limit in effect.

So thanks Raymond, I'm glad this is how yall choose to spend money, even though there are much, MUCH bigger issues. I also love the fact that probably 5% of the active CCA committee has even been triple tail fishing in the last few years.

How do yall plan on using this money to benefit our estuary? There isn't a single person that gets on here and gives us updates. Larry Reynolds takes time out of his day to interact on public forums, give is facts, and present data. You would think that if the CCA is supposed to represent recreational anglers, they would at least maybe come on here and other public forums and give an update every now and then. You're quick to back up CCA, but I doubt you can even give us maybe one or two examples of something yall are currently working on to improve our estuary.

So hurry up, call up your CCA big wigs and come up with an answer.

Originally Posted by "W" (Post 707196)

I will drink to that


Hey Raymond gets to wear that cool aZZ CCA shirt

Originally Posted by OnePunchRex (Post 707181)

I bet that W's "customers" love the fact that they're on a guided trip and the "captain" spends all his time posting BS on the internet. What a tool.

Originally Posted by OnePunchRex (Post 707207)

You ought to be kissing Raymond's boots. If it wasn't for CCA, every "pilgrim" could catch a limit of dinks on his own and you wouldn't have any "bragging rights" to sell your awesome guided trips.

Originally Posted by CAMP CANARD (Post 707210)

Pilgrim pride Sunday ! Look at them dinks

Originally Posted by Natural Light Kid (Post 707209)

My thoughts too. Once again w, you are missing my point, but that's to be expected. I actually agree with you on a lot of Your conservation points you bring up, just not all of them. The point I'm trying to make here is that just a couple of weeks ago you (not just you) made it out as if the fishing on big lake was ruined forever and now your catching limits. Sounds like "global warming" cries followed by a record low winter.

Originally Posted by "W" (Post 707216)

10:06 -am going shrimping

Originally Posted by noodle creek (Post 707189)

Let me go ahead and tell yall how absolutely f***ing stupid the triple tail limit is. Caught 43 the other day, 3 were keepers. It's about equivalent to saying you can only keep a trout 6 lbs or bigger. What's even better is when we got back to spicers and the wildlife and fisheries biologist was taking surveys, we told him we didn't catch sh** because of their stupid triple tail limit. He was so quick to shut us down and say "woahh hold up, it was soley CCA that pushed for that." He then went on to say that there is nowhere near enough data to have a limit in effect.

So thanks Raymond, I'm glad this is how yall choose to spend money, even though there are much, MUCH bigger issues. I also love the fact that probably 5% of the active CCA committee has even been triple tail fishing in the last few years.

How do yall plan on using this money to benefit our estuary? There isn't a single person that gets on here and gives us updates. Larry Reynolds takes time out of his day to interact on public forums, give is facts, and present data. You would think that if the CCA is supposed to represent recreational anglers, they would at least maybe come on here and other public forums and give an update every now and then. You're quick to back up CCA, but I doubt you can even give us maybe one or two examples of something yall are currently working on to improve our estuary.

So hurry up, call up your CCA big wigs and come up with an answer.

Originally Posted by Natural Light Kid (Post 707209)

My thoughts too. Once again w, you are missing my point, but that's to be expected. I actually agree with you on a lot of Your conservation points you bring up, just not all of them. The point I'm trying to make here is that just a couple of weeks ago you (not just you) made it out as if the fishing on big lake was ruined forever and now your catching limits. Sounds like "global warming" cries followed by a record low winter.

Originally Posted by mriguy (Post 707193)

I think Rex is Jadams

Originally Posted by slickfish (Post 707240)

Can't wait to see w's tourney stringer. I'm sure there will be an excuse for that also.