Well you are right about that
But as long as I cant get a ticket for floating over it
I?m good ....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Texas does have a private Harbor Law which has been tried and tested and upheld. So I wonder what that's going to do with any kind of boat launches in the marsh.
Don't get me wrong it is a step in the right direction for Louisiana but the politics of it are going to get crazy.

Private launches I'm sorry that are Private harbors.
Only in an emergency can you be in them or fishing them.
But I do think this bill will help la.fishmen. even with it's flaws it is a start.

yea, that's what I want to see.... guides bringing boatloads of sports thru my deer lease during hunting season, throwing trash and taking sheets all along the bank. I pay money to get away from u people. lol

My god have you read anything ?????

Why would trash be thrown ?
And why would they go on banks that would be trespassing ?
Are they doing it right now ? Because it would be same law now as it will be under HB391
Nothing about land will change ...

Is your deer lease running tidal water ?
And did you read it will be closed off during hunting season ?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I read it just like the white trash around here will read it, if they could read. it's just an excuse to trespass on your land. once they start poking around all day and night, you won't have anything left worth having.

I agree with the concept, but the reality is that the bad apples will screw it up for the good people.

My brother's welding shop has been flooded the last two weeks with people wanting him to build gates. We kinda in a pickle. Want to make the money, but dont want to give in to those greedy landowners.

Take the idiots money! It's after March 2 and surely not properly permitted!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Well.....

so what happened today? will their be boatloads of people tearing up my deerlease tomorrow attempting to 'navagate' on a mudflat?

I'm waiting until Thursday to go.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Ready to navigate!Attachment 135544

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I heard it failed

Hopefully it did. BTW, I own ZERO land that has to do with this. So many people wanting to access someones property for FREE.....

We have some freaking free loaders on this site....:work::work::work:

The butt hurt is strong on facebook. People saying "it's not the sportsman's paradise anymore." Haha the law didn't change, it's still the same as it always has been.

Then there is the "we have rights to navigable waterways." Sure you do, go for it, bayous and rivers are free game far as I know. Not to mention all the public lakes, bays, and refuges that allow us access to hundreds of thousands of acres of marsh. Unfortunately, that's not good enough for some, they want to access every little mudboat trail to every little dead end pond they can get to. That's not right and not how it should be.

I would like to think that if one day I was fortunate enough to own some land, I could do as I please on it. Everyone has every right in the world to try and work their *** off and put themselves in that situation. Lots of these marshes are good because they are private and don't have a ton of pressure. This keeps property value up. I can guarantee that half of these places would be destroyed so quick it would be unreal.

And the ones whining and crying about their tax dollars being spent on this private land by the state....well if you own something of value....you would understand. Most of these jack legs that are whining about this might only have about 50 to 100 bucks of their tax dollars going to these rich land owners for these state funded projects....which is done because in the end it benefits the state and of course indirectly them to....but they are too ignorant to understand it.

So by that way of thinking, the state should be paying to remodel my home? I mean I own it but someone else should pay. Right? I really don't care about this access vs private crap. I just think if its private it should be leveed off so none of the states resources can get back there. If they want a private marsh to fish, then they need to stock it with their own fish.

Glad it failed after all those stupid amendments keep getting added

New bill will be submitted in 2019
The election year

This will be real interesting how it plays out

They wanted to prolong it till 2020 for a reason . This politics think we are stupid LOL

Can?t wait to see them try and buck the majority before Nov ballots !!!

Person should of pulled bill early in house when they keep adding amendments !!
He let them play way too long !!!!

Here is what bill looked like after the added 20 amendments lol
Was pathetic
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...ea66b7e56e.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You just want to fish there because with little pressure fishing is good there. However, if it were ever opened to the public it'd just become another spot and you wouldn't give fishing there a second thought.

If any of you think that this won?t lead to someone hunting that tidal water, that is ridiculous. When someone starts fishing it, guarantee people will start hunting it based off some of the same principals listed above while not anchored.
When your bait touches the bottom of that canal - is that trespassing?
When you overcast n touch the bank - is that trespassing?

And **some** of the public trashes public land/waters. Fact.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk