SaltyCajun.com

SaltyCajun.com (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Discussion (Everything Else) (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Baiting wildlife (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/showthread.php?t=67942)

fisheye 12-07-2017 12:35 AM

Baiting wildlife
 
This is not a troll ....I clarify because it may seem very elemental and obvious to some.

My question is, why is it ok (legal) to bait for some wildlife and not others?

swamp snorkler 12-07-2017 07:26 AM

Why is it okay to shoot a fish at night but not a rabbit?

eman 12-07-2017 08:29 AM

If you put bait out for deer or bears, you may get one or two (maybe more with deer ) to come to the bait at a time and you probably won't pull them from very far away . When you put out bait for birds (ducks and doves ) with enough bait and time you can pull in every bird in the area. Even if you're not an outlaw and you only shoot your limit. You have baited in all the birds in an area .no one else is really going to get to shoot much. Unless you hammer on a baited field or pond every day ,as long as there's food the birds will keep coming back.

Feesherman 12-07-2017 09:06 AM

Because of the ease of disease spread, baiting shouldn't be ok for anything.

Smalls 12-07-2017 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feesherman (Post 829705)
Because of the ease of disease spread, baiting shouldn't be ok for anything.

I believe this is one reason some states have banned the practice, although I don't think you would find that explicitly stated. As far as OP's question though, I do not believe there is a logical reason to explain it across the board. Is it ethics? Is it for ecological reasons such as disease transmission and increased predation caused by the concentration of animals?

It also depends on what you consider baiting. Is a sunflower field planted for doves the same as a corn feeder on a shooting lane for deer?

I believe it comes down to--in most cases--a question of what is viewed as ethical and what isn't. Some states have banned baiting anything. Federally, you cannot bait migratory birds, but for almost anything, you can plant food plots or manipulate vegetation to increase availability of food. Deer hunters talk about honing in on particular food sources. What makes a deer feeder any worse than a white oak tree that every deer within a quarter mile is going to key in on?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Feesherman 12-07-2017 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smalls (Post 829706)

I believe it comes down to--in most cases--a question of what is viewed as ethical and what isn't.



And whose ethics are we to use?

Smalls 12-07-2017 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feesherman (Post 829708)
And whose ethics are we to use?

The matter probably comes down to who is most vocal on the issue of baiting.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

duckman1911 12-07-2017 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smalls (Post 829706)
I believe this is one reason some states have banned the practice, although I don't think you would find that explicitly stated. As far as OP's question though, I do not believe there is a logical reason to explain it across the board. Is it ethics? Is it for ecological reasons such as disease transmission and increased predation caused by the concentration of animals?

It also depends on what you consider baiting. Is a sunflower field planted for doves the same as a corn feeder on a shooting lane for deer?

I believe it comes down to--in most cases--a question of what is viewed as ethical and what isn't. Some states have banned baiting anything. Federally, you cannot bait migratory birds, but for almost anything, you can plant food plots or manipulate vegetation to increase availability of food. Deer hunters talk about honing in on particular food sources. What makes a deer feeder any worse than a white oak tree that every deer within a quarter mile is going to key in on?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

You have a good point. It is a lot of grey area regarding that. You can feed deer but not ducks,doves or turkeys. I can see why the bird hunters may get pissed about that. As you brought up what is the difference between a corn feeder and a food plot. Both are there to get deer in shooting range. Lets not forget the purpose of us being there is to kill something. It can be sugar coated for arguement sake but we go there to kill. Bait or no bait the end result is the same. Unless your deer season is going as crappy as mine lol.

Feesherman 12-07-2017 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duckman1911 (Post 829719)
Bait or no bait the end result is the same.


I think, with very little effort, that can be argued. I don't feel like making very little effort though.

Smalls 12-07-2017 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feesherman (Post 829723)
I think, with very little effort, that can be argued. I don't feel like making very little effort though.

I could see from a moral/philosophical standpoint, or from a fair chase standpoint making an argument, but at the bare bones of it, I would agree with him. At the end of the day, you're killing an animal. The difficulty and morality of it can be argued, but the reality is the same.

However, I would make those very arguments myself. I personally don't believe in baiting, or even food plots as we know them commercially. I feel from the fair chase standpoint, hunting over native food sources is more challenging and "fair" to the wildlife, fair being a largely subjective modifier.

I won't fault a guy for using bait or food plots, though, simply because the argument could be made that hunting a hot oak flat or honey locust trees is no different. There is likely a higher degree of difficulty, because food sources can change quickly, but the premise is the same. You are targetting a preferred food source, and in some years, the deer may choose that oak tree over the corn feeder.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Feesherman 12-07-2017 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smalls (Post 829725)

I won't fault a guy for using bait or food plots, though, simply because the argument could be made that hunting a hot oak flat or honey locust trees is no different. There is likely a higher degree of difficulty, because food sources can change quickly, but the premise is the same. You are targetting a preferred food source, and in some years, the deer may choose that oak tree over the corn feeder.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk



Ok I'll argue a little bit. The man that puts out that corn feeder knows where to go to hunt that corn feeder. It will be there all year long. The hot honey locust tree may never be discovered by a hunter. If it is discovered, it won't be the hot spot for the whole season. It may be discovered too late and the deer may never return to it. The man can sit on that corn feeder all season long and at some point a deer will come to eat his never ending supply. The same cannot be said with certainty for an oak or a honey locust. You can say there is no difference, but in reality...........

Smalls 12-07-2017 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feesherman (Post 829726)
Ok I'll argue a little bit. The man that puts out that corn feeder knows where to go to hunt that corn feeder. It will be there all year long. The hot honey locust tree may never be discovered by a hunter. If it is discovered, it won't be the hot spot for the whole season. It may be discovered too late and the deer may never return to it. The man can sit on that corn feeder all season long and at some point a deer will come to eat his never ending supply. The same cannot be said with certainty for an oak or a honey locust. You can say there is no difference, but in reality...........

But that's exactly what I said. You're arguing whether it's fair chase or not. The argument can only be made that the path to the end result is not the same.

That's not what duckman said. He said the end result is the same, which is the killing of an animal, which there is no guarantee of in either case. I work with a guy that hasn't seen a deer all season at his feeder, but he has them on camera in the area.

I agree with you, but that's not an argument against what he said. That's an argument about the means by which the ends are achieved.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Feesherman 12-07-2017 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smalls (Post 829727)
But that's exactly what I said. You're arguing whether it's fair chase or not. The argument can only be made that the path to the end result is not the same.

That's not what duckman said. He said the end result is the same, which is the killing of an animal, which there is no guarantee of in either case. I work with a guy that hasn't seen a deer all season at his feeder, but he has them on camera in the area.

I agree with you, but that's not an argument against what he said. That's an argument about the means by which the ends are achieved.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk



I've expended all my effort. Ya'll keep up the debate.

duckman1911 12-07-2017 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feesherman (Post 829728)
I've expended all my effort. Ya'll keep up the debate.

You bailed way too fast which leads me to believe you are out of options. In my expetience corn feeders do little more than make deer feed at night. Yeah they are still around but you're in bed while they eat in front of your stand. Other than not purposely being cruel to an animal I don't see any moral issue with corn,food plots etc. As I said it's about killing. The morality of it can be debated for eternity. Especially if you ask the deers opinion on it.

Feesherman 12-07-2017 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duckman1911 (Post 829736)
In my expetience

In all honesty I'm just too dumb to get them big words. Not to mention, I'm off and don't have the need to be entertained anymore

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

duckman1911 12-07-2017 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feesherman (Post 829737)
In all honesty I'm just too dumb to get them big words. Not to mention, I'm off and don't have the need to be entertained anymore

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

L m a o. You got me on that typo for sure. Thankfully you were there to point that out for us. Someone may have been hurt by that. You sir have saved the day. Congrats to you. I know we'll all sleep better knowing you are protecting us from those evil typos. Thank you so very much J

duckman1911 12-07-2017 05:46 PM

Feesherman talking about fair chase. 20 bucks says he has never chased a deer. Sitting in a deer stand is what is happening

elebouef 12-07-2017 05:52 PM

baiting
 
Is water melons still against the law to use as bait?:shaking:;)

Feesherman 12-07-2017 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duckman1911 (Post 829741)
Feesherman talking about fair chase. 20 bucks says he has never chased a deer. Sitting in a deer stand is what is happening

I'm your huckleberry. Pay up

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

duckman1911 12-07-2017 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feesherman (Post 829743)
I'm your huckleberry. Pay up

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

I'll tell you what. If you have a video to prove you chased a deer on foot just post it and pm me your adress. I will pay you. No bs video you found on youtube or such. If you can be honest and post a video of you chasing down a deer i'll pay up.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - [ARG:3 UNDEFINED], Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
All content, images, designs, and logos are Copyright © 2009-2012,
Salty Cajun, LLC
No unathorized use is permitted