79' oil spill?
 

got this in an email today. I was too young to remember this,but it has a lot of similarities of today. Dont care for the negative connotation of the oilfield industry in this story,but seems like someone could come up with a faster fix in 30 years. http://www.wimp.com/oilspills/

check out this one

http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=94670

difference was location


marsh is not as easy to clean as beach

:shaking::shaking::shaking::shaking::shaking:

O LORD HERE WE GO........

I said this 1000 time already............I have posted info about the 79 oil leak...many times........
This is the same thing...... Will have the same out come..........An next time it will be talked about is when we have another oil spill.....
This is not Alaska.....Its the warm gulf which eats oil.....
This BP spill is one thing and one thing only...... Media Superbowl

I never argued any of that w. All I said was that the clean up is different

The Ixtoc disaster affected 162 miles of Texas coastline and 1,421 birds were found with oiled feathers and feet, according to the NOAA. The U.S. commercial fishing industry was negligibly affected by the earlier spill, according to a report by the Bureau of Land Management. Conversely, some 25 percent of the Gulf has been closed to fishermen due to the BP spill.
The Ixtoc spill did cause Texas tourism to take a hit, however. The BLM estimated a seven to 10 percent decrease, while local officials claimed a 60 percent hit. U.S. businesses sued Mexico for more than $300 million in damages, but Mexico claimed sovereign immunity and refused to pay.
The effects to Texas were mitigated, however, because officials had two months to prepare boom and barrier islands before the oil hit.





neg·li·gi·ble-Not significant or important enough to be worth considering; trifling.

Congrats on copying and pasting


Now back to my point the spill did not hit our coast, a very fragile coast.

OK Back to my argument 79 spill did affect some inland marsh land...now explain to me fragile? Let me here some LSU Grad talk on the two marshes.... dont say we had a hurricane or crap like that..... State some Facts from 79 today in both areas..........


Just two weeks ago you was talking about the fishing impact and dead zones....etc...? guess what we dont have 162 miles of land with oil... We have less than 50miles....

Just quit it...... Just admit this will all play out and be forgotten in a few months........:D

Right. There will be no effects come august.

Like i've said from the beginning, I know about oil and marsh grass. That is what I have experience in.

When did I talk about dead zones? Maybe you thought I did. But I don't remember this

like I've told you. My only arguement with you is that this will not be forgotten by august like you claim.

Hell. It could very well still be leaking by augusy

It probably will be still leaking by August....but right now almost all the fishing inland has been opened back up....lots of offshore areas are open back up...... what oil was in the marsh has just about all cleaned up...were ahead of sked.....
i will go post your comments here shortly...:D

Right w. Your right

I should have just not gone go college. That way I could work on a rig and become an expert at Louisiana coastal ecology and copying and pasting

:shaking::shaking::shaking::rolleyes::rolleyes::ro lleyes::rolleyes:

you know more than him???

"Crude is the least of the problem," says Dr. Paul Sammarco, a researcher at the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, who has performed research on the effects of oil spills. If contained and removed in time it usually leaves no lasting impact on marshes. But other petrochemicals likely to have been loosed by Katrina -- refined products like diesel or fuel oil or gasoline -- are much more toxic to wetlands, he says. Should large amounts of those settle into marshes and other lowland areas, "they are much more difficult to deal with

http://news.mongabay.com/2005/0923-oilspills.html

:rotfl:

He isn't saying crude oil is safe for vegetation. He is saying it's not the worst. Which I have said.

Please stop with the copy paste. We are all glad you have learned to do this through lsuE correspondence courses

And that article is from 2005 after Katrina. Completly different problem.

Suprised you don't have to know dates in the oil biz

Please copy and paste some relevant articles

Yak EM was just introduced on ........... Oil Marsh Grass Pro Staff

yak you could hang that in your office!!

Yak em.....really you said that??

So oil from Katrina was not from the Gulf Platforms??? So does it matter if Oil is Oil.... NO Oil from yesterday is the same oil from tomorrow..dont matter.........Your just trying to make a media deal dude...... Get over it..your marsh with oil...will be just as healthy as ever once the oil is cleaned or removed....it will be back like nothing happened.....

Man you should of got a Degree in Trees in Alaska....Really use your brain.