SaltyCajun.com

SaltyCajun.com (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/index.php)
-   Inshore Saltwater Fishing Discussion (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   STAR Adv Trout size decline (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/showthread.php?t=42870)

"W" 04-09-2013 05:05 PM

STAR Adv Trout size decline
 
1 Attachment(s)
Took the Top 3 trout from each year -2001 (NO WEIGHTS LISTED)

PotLikinisAhabbit 04-09-2013 05:14 PM

Whats the p- value?

Lake Chuck Duck 04-09-2013 05:46 PM

2000 pound trout?

PotLikinisAhabbit 04-09-2013 05:56 PM

Im not real sure what an "adv. weight" is but 2000-2012lbs seems about right

PotLikinisAhabbit 04-09-2013 05:58 PM

i guess with the coming of our lord and savior in year one, speckled trout populations were pretty healthy

simplepeddler 04-09-2013 06:04 PM

This could be because there are TOO MANY fish.
an eco system will support so many POUNDS of fish per surface area of water......you can have ten ten pounders or 100 one pounders.........

Duck Butter 04-09-2013 06:22 PM

What McJared said:) p-value bro

Post up the top 3 or 5 or 7 whatever trout 'waits' for each year. You can easily plug that into MS Excel and get a graph and figure out if those weights are statistically significant. MathGeek can probably do it in his head:rotfl: This would actually be something worth doing. Post em up and see what we can figger out.

I would bet its not statistically significant with a p-value set at 0.05.


I saw you have the waits in another thread, i will try and run the numbers in a bit

PotLikinisAhabbit 04-09-2013 06:35 PM

I would run the numbers but I'm very curious as to what he comes up with. Better hope wikipedia has relevant material lol

Duck Butter 04-09-2013 06:52 PM

I just looked at the website, and to be equal:

1. you would have to start the test at 2003 because prior to that the category was just east/west speckled trout and doesn't list where they were 'wade'. I am sure W knows 1000% which of those fish came from Big Lake. So, you are only looking at 2 years pre-hurricane data and comparing that to 6 or 7 years of post-hurricane data so probably not the best set of numbers to compare

2. You would have to only use the top 3 because some years only show 3



Just from looking at the numbers, the East side winning 'wait' appears to have gone down, but there was no limit change over there, so....?
Those numbers should be ran also just to see if there is any significant difference if they actually can be figured. The divisions keep changing and it may not be possible to compare.

"W" 04-09-2013 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PotLikinisAhabbit (Post 569038)
I would run the numbers but I'm very curious as to what he comes up with. Better hope wikipedia has relevant material lol


you go ahead and run that......Im fogged in offshore but not that board:shaking:

"W" 04-09-2013 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duck Butter (Post 569045)
I just looked at the website, and to be equal:

1. you would have to start the test at 2003 because prior to that the category was just east/west speckled trout and doesn't list where they were 'wade'. I am sure W knows 1000% which of those fish came from Big Lake. So, you are only looking at 2 years pre-hurricane data and comparing that to 6 or 7 years of post-hurricane data so probably not the best set of numbers to compare

2. You would have to only use the top 3 because some years only show 3



Just from looking at the numbers, the East side winning 'wait' appears to have gone down, but there was no limit change over there, so....?
Those numbers should be ran also just to see if there is any significant difference if they actually can be figured. The divisions keep changing and it may not be possible to compare.

2002 west is all big lake trout:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Duck Butter 04-09-2013 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W" (Post 569088)
2002 west is all big lake trout:rolleyes::rolleyes:


If that graph represented LNG stock, what would you do?:rotfl:

"W" 04-09-2013 09:21 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Duck Butter (Post 569099)
If that graph represented LNG stock, what would you do?:rotfl:


Sold in 2004 but LNG stock looks way better than this trout


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - [ARG:3 UNDEFINED], Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
All content, images, designs, and logos are Copyright © 2009-2012,
Salty Cajun, LLC
No unathorized use is permitted