http://legis.la.gov/election2012/12amendments.pdf
This link above is without author bias, agenda or personal belief.
It reads "This proposed constitutional amendment, if adopted, will rewrite the existing provision and, instead, provide that the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right which shall not be infringed. It will also provide that any restriction on this right shall be subject to "strict scrutiny", which is the highest standard of review by a court. The "strict scrutiny" test requires that a state have a compelling governmental
interest necessitating the infringement and that there is no less restrictive method of accomplishing the compelling state interest."
My bias in this matter is The statement reading "any restriction will be subject to Strict Scrutiny" is subjective and opens up doors that are not there now. If it is a fundamental right and cannot be infringed then there is no need for a review of any restriction. This amendment needs more work and I say this is opening up loopholes and more subjective interpretation that is unnecessary. This amendment is not ready and needs adjustment and therefore a no vote