
03-02-2013, 05:10 PM
|
 |
Tripletail
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lake Charles
Posts: 875
Cash: 2,078
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck Butter
This^, the squeaky wheel gets the grease and in Louisiana its politics, not science based 'greasing'.
I don't think that a change in limits will do one thing, whether the limit is 5 or 50, take by legal fishing means is not even a drop in the bucket in the overall trout population. These fish grow fast, have lots of little trout at a relatively early age, and can spawn multiple times, so recreational fishing does very little. Habitat is infinitely more important.
One more thing is the oil spill and the Corexit, there are studies out there that are showing impacts of this stuff. I listened to an entymologist talk about not being able to find any insects around the areas where oil was present. It sounds minor, but this is the basis of the food chain. You know that if you ever walk in the marsh, there is no shortage of insects. And also, oil from the Macondo spill washes up on Elmer's and Grand Isle every time there is a storm  and will probably be like that for many years
|
I agree with you and Mathgeek. I have heard several other biologist say the same thing. Mathgeek, if they try to do something stupid with state limits not based on science or facts on the population you need to get involved.
|