View Single Post
  #2  
Old 05-01-2014, 01:11 PM
MathGeek's Avatar
MathGeek MathGeek is offline
King Mackeral
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,931
Cash: 4,552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ratdog View Post
Has the US regulated the ability of its fishermen to help increese the GNP which hit a low of 0.01% for the first quarter.

Would easeing regulatory laws help the fishermen contribute to an increese in GNP?
Not really. Only declared commercial take counts toward GNP numbers. Recreational harvest does not count toward GNP numbers (though it certainly counts on our family's menu).

There are federal tax forms that are very specific to commercial fishermen. If someone is making more revenue from commercial harvest than they are declaring on these forms, then only the part declared on the forms is going to show up in the GNP numbers.

Decline in the commercial fishery numbers is related to numerous factors:

1. Other areas of national production are growing.
2. Commercial take is declining due to over regulation (Snapper).
3. Commercial take is declining due to habitat (Oysters).
4. Commercial take is declining due to fuel costs and cheaper imports (Shrimp).
5. Commercial take is declining for unknown reasons (Crabs).
6. Commercial take is declining due to market/business reasons (Menhaden).
7. Appearance of commercial take is declining due to tax cheats (just guessing). Stuff like Obamacare raises costs greatly for the big producers (like Omega Protein) who are more likely to use accurate accounting practices and pay all their taxes. This shifts production to smaller businesses which are more likely to have smaller cash transactions, less rigorous accounting practices, and less declared fishing income on the federal tax forms.
Reply With Quote