Quote:
Originally Posted by silver_snipe
1. How is a research insititute like obamacare? Are they forcing the citizens to buy something from a private company? Obamacare does that.
2. If one side is happy and the other is mad then the person govering is playing favorites and is not really looking out for the people. If both sides are upset cause neither got what they wanted then they are looking out for everyone. As for the actual tax cited here I don't know anything about it so whether it's right or wrong I have no opinion.
3. How is this different from the required MMR, Polio, and other immunizations required to start school? Especially since the vast majority of cervical cancer is caused by this virus and over 75% of women are exposed to it in their life time.
4. Again I know nothing of this issue and have no opinion.
|
1.) I stated that the way it was funded was just like Obama care
2) if both sides are upset then it could clearly mean the gain is to be had by the politician and his buddies
3) HPV is an STD, that means you get it from unprotected sex or passed down to you from your mother who was having unprotected sex. Routine checkups will find this well in advance of cervical cancer and can easily be eliminated... Educate yourself as a parent, educate your kid and leave the legislation and forceful nature out of something as easily prevented and/or controlled as HPV. And I don't believe the fact that his OAL was a lobbyist for Merck is such a coincidence.................
http://www.ihs.gov/healthcommunicati...uments/HPV.doc