I understand the idea that when the camera is turned on or off can completely change the context of what you see in the recording, such as the perps fighting the cops then the camera is turned on only at the point he gets the physical takedown he initiated and instigated but I see no way this is a reasonable logical request or how it can be deemed constitutional.
the camera is no more then just a digital eye witness that isn't prejudiced by emotion or opinion even though what it captures can be manipulated to "some" extent as expressed above, by not showing the full event from beginning to end.
|