View Single Post
  #139  
Old 03-20-2015, 12:21 AM
MathGeek's Avatar
MathGeek MathGeek is offline
King Mackeral
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,931
Cash: 4,452
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keakar View Post
I remember all the grad promises made by CCA and its cheerleaders touting, "just wait and see, CCA is doing all sorts of things behind the scenes but we cant talk about it just yet"

well where is this magic they promised they were doing "behind the scenes"? maybe we need to wait 30-40 years before they can talk about it lol.

why aren't they working to double red limits and reduce minimum size limits on them to 14"?

why aren't they fighting to increase speck limits state wide back up to 25 fish per day everywhere?

why aren't they working to remove black limits altogether and reduce minimum size limits on them to 14"?

all 3 of these have science saying it will not hurt the population but actually help the populations and the fishery to do them.
Great questions. I think CCA showed a decade ago that they are not really about habitat protection or conservation or sound science.

They are about bringing money back to TX for restoration projects there and also about exporting restrictive TX-style regulations to LA.
Reply With Quote