[Andrepont42]

Everyone is saying how is was a man with a violent past, but he was a good guy and trying to turn his life around. Okay I get that people change, but why if he was on such a positive path, was he in violation of the law at the time of the tragic incident. Breaking the law doesn't seem like a prominent path to a better future to me? He was in violation of the law not only by resisting arrest, but also by being in possession of a fire arm, a illegal fire arm at that. In the state of LA a person who has been convicted of a felon crime while in possession of a fire arm and controlled substance, no longer has the right to bear arms. The minimum sentencing for a convicted felon breaking this law is 10 years, so he was on the way back to the pin if he wouldn't of been shot. Im not saying if the shooting was justifiable or not that is up to criminal justice professionals. This shouldn't be a shock to the media that this day in age a criminal with a violent wrap sheet, who is dis agreeing to comply with law enforcement, while in possession of a firearm gets shot.