Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck Butter
Nice strawman because I am sure every single time MR goes out and 'enjoys a hobby' he gets questioned and harassed and frisked 
You forgot to answer this question:
What was the sheriff supposed to do? Should he have just let them go? |
I did answer the question. But let's look at your whole quote and not take a cherry picked question out of context. You stated this;
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck Butter
He didn't have any PROOF of permission to be hunting there. I am not taking sides, but I can clearly see both sides of the argument (i.e. no blinders). Think about it from the sheriff's side (i.e. no blinders), he gets a call there is a possible trespasser (two armed men don't forget), there is no proof they are to be on the property (no written proof, no verbal proof) for all the sheriff knows they ARE trespassers at that time.
Answer this - What was the sheriff supposed to do? Should he have just let them go?  (there is not one shred of evidence they are NOT trespassing remember  )
It was a complicated situation and I would have been pizzed too if I got frisked but I bet you I would have written permission next time I went out there 
dammit, this thing is gonna go 20 pages! |
Which I replied that it's not up to us to PROVE were not trespassing. You're so concerned with what we expect the deputy should've done. I'm more concerned with what he shouldn't have done. We'll start with pointing a loaded gun at my face when I haven't broken any laws, then playing graba$$ by frisking me. But let's take up for the deputy, we'd hate for him to be bullied on an Internet forum!