Quote:
Originally Posted by Spunt Drag
It's not a case of "who's righter and who's wronger". The dude was 100% legal, just trying to enjoy an afternoon hunt, on property he had permission to be on. He was harassed, take the blinders off.
|
He didn't have any PROOF of permission to be hunting there. I am not taking sides, but I can clearly see both sides of the argument (i.e. no blinders). Think about it from the sheriff's side (i.e. no blinders), he gets a call there is a possible trespasser (two armed men don't forget), there is no proof they are to be on the property (no written proof, no verbal proof) for all the sheriff knows they ARE trespassers at that time.
Answer this -
What was the sheriff supposed to do? Should he have just let them go? 
(there is not one shred of evidence they are NOT trespassing remember
)
It was a complicated situation and I would have been pizzed too if I got frisked but I bet you I would have written permission next time I went out there
dammit, this thing is gonna go 20 pages!