![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Boating Talk For discussion of everything related to boats and motors |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've fished a boat that has a 250 SHO and it's sweeeeet! If going on a bay boat u need to mount it on a jackplate bcuz of the 20" shaft . I have heard those merc xs and proxs can be temperamental . If it was me I'd get the sho
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was looking at adding a 10" hydraulic jackplate to whichever one I choose. It will probably be a 21' or 22' center console.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Pm member waterbowl on here he has one on his boat
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd get the four stoke reliability for SHO
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I heard the XS was faster than the pro xs. Is that right?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Get the SHO
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was speaking with the owner of LMC Marine is Houston today at lunch and the SHO came up. He had a 250 PRO XS on his boat and replaced it with a 250SHO. He believes the SHO to be the same speed as the PRO XS if not faster with the advantages of a 4 stroke. Get ready because there will be 30 or more people on this site that will tell you a PRO XS is faster and maybe it is but this person has access to Yam and Merc engines and obviously can get them at cost and decided to go with the SHO. That to me is very telling. He has only used his boat in saltwater and has a jackplate.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my EVO |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok......I have been doing some work on the Sho....because I'm thinking about getting one on my next Haynie..
He is what I have found Fuel mileage is better on Opi max vs Sho on same boat... Sho is heavier vs Opti Max A guy ran a Sho 250 on a Trition for one month and ran the Opi 250 on same boat He burned almost double the fuel with the sho...said fuel mileage is horrible This is a guide who had the Sho to demo... |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
stick to the sho paul. I wouldn't go the zuk route
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And he said the 250 Opt was about 4mph faster on top speed
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Man i had the suzuki ss peice of crap,it did not run as good as my 225 yamaha 4 stroke does.And to top it off it did not even last me a year.But to each his own.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my EVO |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And here we go again.
Yammie for SHO. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Who are you referring to, pilgrim?
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The 2 guys I know with em both have nothing but good things to say about the sho fuel consumption, speed, reliability
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I do not know anyone with a SHO that has not been happy with it. The Zukes always seem slower than both the Yam and the Merc.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know someone in Houston with a Haynie 24HO and a 250SHO, it ran 65mph loaded which is exactly what the 250PRO XS typically runs. 4mph would put an HO at almost 70 tournament loaded with a 250 PRO, sorry but I don't see it since a 300 2 stroke racing motor only runs around 70 or slightly above on that boat.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just relying what I was told.....now a trition is a lead sled also.....
He is doing a test right now on the fuel milage @ 4000 rpm vs both motors....to see if the sho gets better milage at that rate....because at 48-52 is was like 2.2 miles to the Gal |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|