SaltyCajun.com - Heating up on new fees

SaltyCajun.com (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/index.php)

- Inshore Saltwater Fishing Discussion (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)

- - Heating up on new fees (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/showthread.php?t=52982)

Slickfish mad because he can't find another picture of someone's fish to post

Dude posted up some reds one time acting like he was beast mode fisherman

Lmao

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W" (Post 686364)

Slickfish mad because he can't find another picture of someone's fish to post

Dude posted up some reds one time acting like he was beast mode fisherman

Lmao

Oh hey what's up duck? Nice mixed bag of Adams leftovers today.

Quote:

Originally Posted by slickfish (Post 686366)

Oh hey what's up duck? Nice mix bag of Adams leftovers today.

Quack Quack Quack

Quote:

Originally Posted by slickfish (Post 686352)

Well you boasted about la just enough to call bs. Why would you want to promote something that is not the truth? On the gulf coast what does la have to offer out of towners Bl and Venice? I'd put money on it that Texas has more out of state tourism from Sabine to Galveston than the whole state of la. Think your just running your bubble gums to keep pace with the lake midget.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk

lol...youre a misguided lil guy

Quote:

Originally Posted by slickfish (Post 686352)

I've fished LA, NY, OH, MI, CO, NC, GA, SC, AK, FL, and maybe a few I'm forgetting. There is nothing like Louisiana. Nothing even close. The waters teem with life. I've never seen anything even close. It is awesome beyond description.

It's more than Big Lake and Venice. It's the whole coast from Sabine to the Rigolets. I'll draw your particular attention to the area around Port Fourchon and Grand Isle. There's a spot just SE of E Timbalier Island where my brother says, "75% of the fish I've caught in my life I've caught in this spot" and he's only fished it a handful of times. I prefer Belle Pass and Caminada Pass, because I like the big ones.

I could live anywhere in the US, but I choose Louisiana, because the fishing is awesome, and Louisiana still loves liberty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MathGeek (Post 686390)

I'm not saying that's not true but when you say:

Supply and demand. Out of staters will pay to fish in Louisiana because the fishing is so good and the limits are so high. Far fewer non-residents are interesting in paying to fish in Texas.

If you've been to all the places you say you have then you know that's not the truth. Just calling bs on bs that's all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by slickfish (Post 686400)

We got a real Bubble Gum here

http://www.census.gov/prod/www/fishing.html
mg was right...in 2011 LA sold 125,000 non-resident fishing licenses, while TX only sold 114,000. While not a huge difference, I can honestly say I was surprised, and I stand corrected. A lot of good statistics in that report for anybody interested.

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W" (Post 686317)

Big Lake SPR was around 18-19 when the last SPR was released

Which is above

Previously you said

Quote:

Last word I got on SPR# see dates

Thanks for your interest in spotted seatrout management. As you
are probably aware it takes several years after regulatory changes are
in place before those changes can be accurately measured in an
assessment. We are currently compiling any and all new information that has been collected since our last full stock assessment in 2005 with plans to complete a new assessment in late 2009 or early 2010. We will be happy to provide you with those results as they become available.
Thanks again.

The Department's adopted a conservation standard is 18% static
SPR per biological examination of stock, as outlined below in the 2005
assessment. What this means is that we believe there is a possible risk
of adversely impacting recruitment if SPR is allowed to remain below
18%. In order to avoid going below the threshold, the department has
adopted the following conservation standard. For spotted seatrout,
fishing regulations should not allow cumulative fishing mortality rates
to reduce the spawning potential of a cohort on average below 18% static
SPR. This conservation standard is designed to stabilize the spawning
potential of a cohort at or above the median level found in the 1980's,
where existing evidence indicates that the spawning stock had not been
reduced to a level that would adversely impact recruitment.

The 2004 status of the stock, defined as the static SPR, is
14.5%, a substantial decline from the 20.9% SPR reported in 2000. This
is below the conservation standard of 18% described above.

Current assessment in 2005, with data through 2004. Static SPR
of 14.5%. We are currently in process of reviewing, updating and
modifying this assessment to include new information sources and
assessment methods.

Speckmeister asked

Quote:

"W"....that's old data....correct?

W answered:

Quote:

Yes last one they sent, had to dig through emails to find it

They will not give 2010/2011 data

:shaking:

Where did you get the 18-19 SPR from? What years:confused:

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duck Butter (Post 686503)

Previously you said

Speckmeister asked

W answered:

:shaking:

Where did you get the 18-19 SPR from? What years:confused:

__________________

Last SPR which was 2004 Big Lake was 18-19 from WLF just Big Lake

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W" (Post 686518)

Last SPR which was 2004 Big Lake was 18-19 from WLF just Big Lake

and we are just supposed to take your word for that?

Give me a link bro:rotfl: