Thread: Pro XS Vs. SHO
View Single Post
  #28  
Old 07-04-2011, 10:11 PM
Montauk17's Avatar
Montauk17 Montauk17 is offline
Great White
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 10,803
Cash: 2,738
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evis102 View Post
That is dry weight. The SHO should take around 6 quarts of oil. The Zuks are having way to many corrosion problems for me to consider. There is no way the SHO will perform as well as a properly setup XS. That being said it's close enough that not having to buy oil would be worth it. I had a Merc racing XS on my 22' Triton lts that would do 62mph. In my Haynie LS I can hit 70 with the same motor. I promise a SHO would not touch those numbers on the same boats. What it boils down to is this. Mercury = cost less, faster but uses oil. SHO = cost more, slower than a mec, uses more gas(i have hear this from more than one person) but change oil once a year. Do your research and make you choice.
Compare the two at WOT and the sho does burn more. Compare at mid range the sho burns 2-3 less GPH.
Reply With Quote