Quote:
Originally Posted by biggun
W.. I think the meeting With all concerned Is absolutely wonderful.. Awesome...
This could have come about much earlier in my humble opinion if Everyone put as much effort in to getting this meeting together than moaning and groaning about every organization in this state on this website.
It's a little funny that U all curse CCA, Corp., then ask for their help...
Here's is a Idea.. Let's stop blaming others. And ALL WORK TOGETHER.
BE PART OF THE SOLUTION.. Jeremy, I applaud U if U had anything to do with this July 9th meeting. Hopefully this will make a difference...
|
1st off not person or persons can take credit for the meeting it was from many people like me and other on this site who have made noise and raised concerns !
2nd work together ??? If that was that easy we never would have a democrats and Republican Party would we?
As far as CCA goes I was on the board in lake Charles and besides one guide that I know of , no on that board ever spent more than 3 days on big lake a month .
If you want people to run a real commitee board have people who know what the hell is going on !!
Do you think we needed a 15 trout limit ?? Hell no ! But you want me to trust the same CCA that told me they would not support limit reduction with out the lastest and greatest data ( 2005 CCA supported a trout reduction with zero data )
CCA just supported a license increase fee for the WL&F and WL&F will not release any data
But now CCA wants data?? So you support WL&F to get increase in money ( knowing they Are holding info )
But now you want info from WL&F after they get the money
CCA should of had balls and said NO we the CCA will not support a fee increase until the WL&F released new data
But but but "sit tight " right