Quote:
Originally Posted by Smalls
I posted the thread that this "guy" was discussed in, and no, it was not posted. I asked him for the name, and he ignored me.
And I'm pretty sure the argument made by W for months has been the weirs should be left open all the time. So yes, the argument has been made that operating (or not operating) the weirs properly IS a good thing.
The primary purpose of the weirs is not, and never has been fisheries management.
|
There have been multiple threads about it, it may not be in that one. I know I'm not dreaming.
It is kind of beside the point anyway. Do you really think that W doesn't know who is in control of weirs? Is it impossible to you that maybe, just maybe, the person controlling the weirs IS a big duck hunter back there?
I'm over this argument, I never argued about your data and this and that. All I ever said is that they aren't being operated correctly as far as everyone can see. Also, protecting the land behind the weirs by keeping them shut is cutting off a huge part of our estuary's bait/food source. I understand the point of the weirs is to control land loss and not fisheries management, but it is hurting the lake. I guess it's one or the other, but not both.
Like I said, rock the ship channel and the weirs won't be such a big issue.