View Single Post
  #87  
Old 08-20-2014, 02:52 PM
AceArcher's Avatar
AceArcher AceArcher is offline
Red Snapper
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: leesville
Posts: 1,080
Cash: 2,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Top Dawg View Post
Exactly. And who's to say he won't take your weapon and use it on you if opportunity presents itself.
So are you saying that if you have a son who is a big man, you have no issue if he is shot and killed because a police officer feels that he is "threatening" him? (Yes i am well aware that there was more to the situation than this)

Keep in mind that said police officers actions are only reviewed by other police officers who work in the same system that he does. There is no independent review of his actions.

I understand that it's very easy to second guess a police officer while he is out doing his duty, at the same time i do believe that deadly force is a necessary option for the police officer to draw on to do his duty.

And that is exactly why reviews of all shootings should be conducted by completely independent entities. Who should have the power to hold the officer severely accountable for improper conduct.

Overwhelmingly most police officers are good folks doing good work trying to uphold the law, but like with everything there are bad and very rotten apples in the mix. Independent review with strong disciplinary action for misconduct may cause those bad apples to think twice.
Reply With Quote