Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural Light Kid
My point was when Keekar makes statement like 20% of all Chevys are lemons, it makes it hard to take him seriously when he's crying for "science based" information. You are right though, I don't agree with what a lot of people say on here but it's a free country. It just humors me when guides feel as though they know what's best for the calcasieau estuary. My experience is that MOST guides want what's best for themselves. I'm not defending CCA by no means but it's like we are reliving the whole DU thing from 10-15 years ago all over again. This uprising against CCA didn't start til the guides weren't catching fish on big lake just like no one had a problem with DU until they had a couple bad years duck hunting. It's like it's got to be somebody's fault. Also, Keekar, can you explain to us what makes CCA "corrupt"?
|
You won't get any disagreement from me in terms of the guides. The proof is in the pudding as they say. Just look at the ridiculous weir discussions that have happened on this forum. Those are proof alone that there are many people, not just guides, that lack the basic knowledge of marsh and estuary ecology, yet they argue that the weirs are killing the lake. But when there is science that backs up what they are saying in terms of the fish limits, and CCA pushed for and continues to push for more conservative limits, there is a problem.