I seriously doubt that IGFA is just handing out a record without more proof than the details that are shared in an article.
Just because we've only seen one photograph, I highly doubt that was the only one taken. If you take them at their word, they had a measuring apparatus to be able to record the measurement in the first place, so perhaps photos have been sent with the measured fish?
Who knows what's true? All I'm saying is the jury is still out. Don't be so quick to render a verdict.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|