![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Boating Talk For discussion of everything related to boats and motors |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Mako 1901 Has the Mercury 2 Stroke 150 Optimax I have no clue when it comes to Mercurys but the prices are damn good so any help with some Pros and Cons on these motors would be great!! THANK YALL!! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have owned (2) Mako 1901 in the last year or two. One had a 150 Opti and the other a Suki 140 4-stroke. They were Both great but if they were side by side I would probably take the one with the Optimax. For some reason I really like that engine. Good performance on the 19' Mako and "sipped" fuel. Just my .02
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So 1901 is the way to go over the 191?
I hear the suki 4 strokes are very good if that was an option i would go 4 stroke but then again i have no clue because this will be my first boat i have owned per say |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The 191 is probably a little lighter boat and easier to clean. The 1901 is heavier and thus a better ride in a chop. The Suki is a great motor but it was really heavy on the back end of the Mako and I didn't like the trottle control...never could get use to it.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
well **** lol im stuck between these two boats!! I just dont like how there is no back deck on the 1901.
And how do the Merc EFI's hold up in saltwater all good or lean more towards the optimax? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I never owned an EFI so I can't comment on them one way or the other
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i hear you, but thanks for the other info though budd! Much Appreciated!
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Opti all the way. They are more fuel efficient than the EFI and have a little more pep.
Warren |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I tourney fished (bass) with alot of guys who own the Opti's, never heard a bad word on them........Very good on fuel & will run!
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
hmmmm looking like its gonna be the 1901
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a 191 with a suzuki 150, it came with the 140 but Travis upgraded to 150 for $800 more. Very happy with the 150 it's a beast, the boat can take up to a 175. I bet it would fly with a merc 175 proxs. As for the boat I like it... if you have any questions let me know.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
go with the 191 and the 150 opti its a lighter hull and it will be quicker with the opti the 191 is bare bones fishing machine way more room inside with that rolled edge than a liner boat has
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
X2....I'm on board with D and Pox
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Optimax no doubt over the four stroke
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a merc 150 EFI. Get the optimax mine drinks way too much fuel.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Now that the motor question is solved......you sure you wanna go with the mako?? They were bought out years ago.....not the boat they used to be.....IMHO
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well it's a damn good price for a brand new boat and I hate these nautic stars, I was looking at a blue wave 20 footer with a Suzuki 150 4 stroke it's 7 grand more but I'm confused as **** on what to do lol. I like the lay out of all 3 boats just can't decide but that blue wave 200 V Bay is super roomy!
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do yourself a favor. Go look at the blazer bay rolled hulls......you'll be really happy you did.....send Finfeatherfur a pm.....
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Btw....I too don't like the naudic star line.....and I'm not trying to bash you, just throwing ideas out there
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Who is a blazer bay dealer around here?
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|