![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Inshore Saltwater Fishing Discussion Discuss inshore fishing, tackle, and tactics here! |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
We've completed the data analysis from our creel survey data from 2011 and 2012 relating to the Calcasieu Estuary. The data and other background suggests that the dominant factor most likely responsible for the decline in the condition factor of fish and slow growth is the overharvesting of oysters from Calcasieu Lake in the 2010-2011 oystering season. We're writing up our results now and hope to have a draft ready to submit for publication in a few weeks.
We've found a number of relevant LDWF press releases and also the info and reports at the CCAL site and popular press, as well as a relevent LSU Master's Thesis by Steven Beck. The purpose of this post is to request pointers to additional references or study results regarding the overharvesting of oysters in Calcasieu Estuary at any time from 2005 to the present, but especially in 2010-2011. Certainly pointers to references related to other possible causal factors would be appreciated as well. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
1st season they went to dregging it was over harvested
__________________
Waltrip's Saltwater Guide Service jeremy@geaux-outdoors.com https://m.facebook.com/waltrip.guideservice?id=148838538646862&_rdr |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It has been very difficult to get any actual data from LDWF especially since the oil spill, they have been issued a gag order from their attorneys. You can sometimes go to lsu.edu in the natural resources department and look at theses and dissertations under the students' major professor. They sometimes have them as a .pdf file under their profile. Sending you a PM
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
LDWF has been very tight with the info. We've gotten a couple of letters in legalese from their attorneys in response to requests for info. Thanks for the hints and the PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My understanding is that dredging became legal in 2005. Certainly, dredging has a negative impact on the reef structure and benthos that make the reef their home. However, are you aware of any hard evidence or published assertions from reliable sources suggesting over-harvesting prior to 2011?
As much as I respect your opinion, I don't think I can cite "W at Salty Cajun said so" in a scholarly paper. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Who knows? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Try shooting an email to Dr. Megan LaPeyre with LSU RNR, she should be able to point you to something your looking for.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not sure if this will help.....
The picture were taken on 4-21-10 along the south bank of the lake. This was just 2 of the many many oyster dredging boat that I saw that day. There must have been 30 or 40 boats working the SW part of Big Lake and West Cove areas. There was steady traffic going and coming from Cameron that day. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The dearth of oysters suggests it would be good to keep every black drum you catch until the oysters come back. Big bull drum can devour 2-4 dozen oysters per day, and even the smaller black drum can wreak havoc on the seed oysters and the spat.
All the fisheries in Big Lake benefit from healthy oyster reefs, and in the areas where oystering will be closed, the drum are the biggest enemy of a quick return of healthy oyster reefs. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's not the dredges that are over harvesting, it is the number of licenses.
Before dredging, there was probably 75 or so boats. After the dredging was made legal, the number was over 200 licenses. It is too easy to dredge. The tong fishermen caught their 15 sacks a day. But trippling the number of boats really hurt. They let them dredge, hoping that they would roll more oysters, making them grow better and kill the mussels. But easy money brought in too many more boats. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can the speckled trout fishing slowdown during 2013 trace back to the oyster over harvesting ?
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Probably, how West Cove has any oysters left amazes me!! Zero seeding and months of dredging
__________________
Waltrip's Saltwater Guide Service jeremy@geaux-outdoors.com https://m.facebook.com/waltrip.guideservice?id=148838538646862&_rdr |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Bull reds were real skinny and growing slow, as were bull drum, like 80% of their normal weight. Most fish below 80% of expected weight at a given length do not survive. Gafftops were down too. Juvenile redfish were also fat and happy. Raping the oyster reefs hurts the more benthic feeders (gafftops, bull reds, drum) more than it hurts the juvenile redfish and the specks. With the closing of the pogey plant (Omega Protein), we're looking for there to be a lot more Gulf Menhaden around in 2014, so look for both specks and redfish to be fat and happy. Remember that population and body condition are a teter tot. A lot of skinny, hungry fish means they are easy to catch. Smaller numbers that are fat and harder to catch is actually a good thing, because they will be more likely to grow to trophy sizes and have higher fecundity rates. Trout are healthy and in balance in 2013. I am worried much more about the redfish and the drum. At 80% body condition, fecundity rates will be very low. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MathGeek, with the ongoing increase in redfish population, do you feel that it affects the 80% theory ?
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Further, redfish do not have high levels of generational fidelity to one estuary (like seatrout), so a dip in body condition (and fecundity) in one estuary does not have the same impact. Also, the number of redfish eggs depends both on the population of mature females and the fecundity of each. Reduced average fecundity in one estuary is thus balanced by higher numbers of mature females and also by migration of eggs, larvae, and fish between estuaries. Redfish in other areas of Louisiana (Barataria, Terrebonne, Sabine) are not experiencing the same declines in body condition as the mature redfish in Calcasieu. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by CharlieFoxtrot; 02-09-2014 at 11:43 AM. Reason: Quotations |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
A legitimate concern is that reseeding the west side would bring additional harvest pressure that would make the reseeding a net loss. Better to let natural reseeding from remaining west side oysters and from drift fro the east side and from Sabine contribute. This will yield less localized oyster bars that are not so easily located and destroyed. In the meantime, one hopes that local oystering infrastructure will be largely dismantled and that ongoing local pressure will be more commensurate with naturally occurring supply. Reseeding just keeps the local harvest pressure up and begins to engender an entitlement mentality as if the government has taken the ability to earn a living away from people if the cycle of seeding and raping is not maintained. Plans to build a saltwater barrier at Calcasieu pass make seeding and conservation of oysters in the estuary a temporary proposition at best. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Plans to build a saltwater barrier at Calcasieu pass make seeding and conservation of oysters in the estuary a temporary proposition at best.
MathGeek When is this likely to happen? I can't wait to go bass fishing in Turner's. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|