CCA- Another Epic Failure

[Ratdog]

Originally Posted by Duck Butter

I think it would be of interest to most to look into how non-profit conservation organizations work. They can only do so much, they are bound by money so have to pick and choose battles to fight. Going against Jindal would likely just be a waste of time (this happened several years back and he got reelected without a hiccup) and there are much bigger fights that could possibly be won, this one isn't one of those. Its basically closing the barn door after the horse has eaten all the hay

see y'all monday, 20 pages or bust

Non profit ? What does that mean. Kill the fish you want to protect to rais money to pay your members?


Man I got real screwed in da edumacation area.

[MathGeek]

Originally Posted by Ratdog

Non profit ? What does that mean. Kill the fish you want to protect to rais money to pay your members?


Man I got real screwed in da edumacation area.

Good point. There are a dozen CCA staffers in Texas pulling in six figure salaries.

I guess CCA was too busy prepping for the case to lower limits on specks and reds to make the meetings to preserve the dedicated funds.

[3FLa]

To Duck Butter... Yes, we did have someone at that meeting, thus I have been able to report what was actually happening.

You commented the following "what did YOUR group do". I do not have a group, the folks I am with believe the group is "OURS", not "yours".

"Ours" being inclusive of any one who believes that we have one of the worlds greatest fisheries and wants to keep it that way.

"Ours" being a group of like-minded people who want to allow everyone to fish and have access to our great waterways, not just a select few.

"Ours" being a respected group in state and federal law-making decisions, not being laughed at in Baton Rouge and Washington D.C.

"Ours" being a group of fisherpeople who join as one not to win a bush league prize but to be a voice of reason for our kid's future.

DB..That is the problem with CCA, it is for a select few, doing whats best for a select few, not for the recreational fisherman as a whole.

[keakar]

Originally Posted by 3FLa

To Duck Butter... Yes, we did have someone at that meeting, thus I have been able to report what was actually happening.

You commented the following "what did YOUR group do". I do not have a group, the folks I am with believe the group is "OURS", not "yours".

"Ours" being inclusive of any one who believes that we have one of the worlds greatest fisheries and wants to keep it that way.

"Ours" being a group of like-minded people who want to allow everyone to fish and have access to our great waterways, not just a select few.

"Ours" being a respected group in state and federal law-making decisions, not being laughed at in Baton Rouge and Washington D.C.

"Ours" being a group of fisherpeople who join as one not to win a bush league prize but to be a voice of reason for our kid's future.

DB..That is the problem with CCA, it is for a select few, doing whats best for a select few, not for the recreational fisherman as a whole.

you are wasting your time, from DBs posting record I believe he is a member of CCA or married to one and working on their behalf to improve public image and try to nullify or silence any opposing voice or viewpoints not in love with everything CCA does.

he CANNOT be independent and be so willingly blind and refuse to admit the evidence presented to him time and time again and they give us no reason to support them and EVERY reason to try to work against them and try to limit the damage they are doing. but then I guess people believe whatever they want to believe, just look at what hope and change got us.

point is every CCA member could stand on TV and admit to being guilty of lying and not doing as they promise and DB would still be there saying support them, give them money, just wait.

[eman]

Originally Posted by 3FLa

To Duck Butter... Yes, we did have someone at that meeting, thus I have been able to report what was actually happening.

You commented the following "what did YOUR group do". I do not have a group, the folks I am with believe the group is "OURS", not "yours".

"Ours" being inclusive of any one who believes that we have one of the worlds greatest fisheries and wants to keep it that way.

"Ours" being a group of like-minded people who want to allow everyone to fish and have access to our great waterways, not just a select few.

"Ours" being a respected group in state and federal law-making decisions, not being laughed at in Baton Rouge and Washington D.C.

"Ours" being a group of fisherpeople who join as one not to win a bush league prize but to be a voice of reason for our kid's future.

DB..That is the problem with CCA, it is for a select few, doing whats best for a select few, not for the recreational fisherman as a whole.

That is what save our specks and GCCA started out to be . but alas no more.

[Ratdog]

Originally Posted by 3FLa

To Duck Butter... Yes, we did have someone at that meeting, thus I have been able to report what was actually happening.

You commented the following "what did YOUR group do". I do not have a group, the folks I am with believe the group is "OURS", not "yours".

"Ours" being inclusive of any one who believes that we have one of the worlds greatest fisheries and wants to keep it that way.

"Ours" being a group of like-minded people who want to allow everyone to fish and have access to our great waterways, not just a select few.

"Ours" being a respected group in state and federal law-making decisions, not being laughed at in Baton Rouge and Washington D.C.

"Ours" being a group of fisherpeople who join as one not to win a bush league prize but to be a voice of reason for our kid's future.

DB..That is the problem with CCA, it is for a select few, doing whats best for a select few, not for the recreational fisherman as a whole.

OH MY GOD ! you need a group name in order for us to believe you. Otherwise my 6 ratdog's can say the same crap about kibble and I can't hold um accountable.

Form an association and project your socialist view and then try to get heard. Might call it the "our social club" or osc love that name

[eman]

Originally Posted by Ratdog

OH MY GOD ! you need a group name in order for us to believe you. Otherwise my 6 ratdog's can say the same crap about kibble and I can't hold um accountable.

Form an association and project your socialist view and then try to get heard. Might call it the "our social club" or osc love that name

***?

[eman]

Originally Posted by Ratdog

OH MY GOD ! you need a group name in order for us to believe you. Otherwise my 6 ratdog's can say the same crap about kibble and I can't hold um accountable.

Form an association and project your socialist view and then try to get heard. Might call it the "our social club" or osc love that name

***? WTH?

[Ratdog]

Originally Posted by eman

***? WTH?

Our little dinner club meets on sat. Nights were we discuss the issues and our view points.??????

..?WTH???

[3FLa]

It is logically impossible for me to addess your statment that lacks any logic.

Please do a google search and learn what socialism really means.