![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
General Discussion (Everything Else) Discuss anything that doesn't belong in any other forums here. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read an article a while back that said Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi had banned the sell of Swai because of illegal antiobiotics.
The article went on to say that some people were skeptical of that line of reasoning, simply because of the amount of catfish farmed in the 3 states. I don't know who else would be involved in the case if it weren't LDWF. Also, there is a federal law that makes it illegal to label anything as catfish that is not a member of the Ictaluridae family. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
When it comes to restrictions, especially with no sound reasons for them, you can look to CCA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Seems to me the logical explanation here is that an industry that reportedly contributes $4 billion annually (according to The Catfish Institute) to the Louisiana economy found a way to protect their investment, and (along with other states) had a law enacted requiring accurate labeling. Then, as if thar wasn't enough, they got the state itself to ban the sell of Swai and anything else that wasn't a catfish or could pass as a catfish. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They don't, I just take every opportunity I can to expose them.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|