Welcome to SaltyCajun.com!

ckinchen · #1 06-05-2012, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Salty

I believe I stated that....19 pages ago.

Speakin' of trout limits......you 'bout ready to bust out them lights, Casey? My wife has promised me a couple days off.

It is about that time, just let me know when. I just got the boat back two weeks ago it is ready to go.

Salty · #2 06-05-2012, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckinchen

It is about that time, just let me know when. I just got the boat back two weeks ago it is ready to go.

We'll have to wait 'til W goes back offshore. I don't want him hangin' around the entire time.

huntin fool · #3 06-05-2012, 08:31 PM

We can all point a finger at something. But until something is written on paper, and pushed, nothing will happen. I believe that was the plan 19 pages ago. Sure we can say the lake is overpopulated and not enough bait, then that leads to the weirs.

jdm4x43732 · #4 06-05-2012, 08:42 PM

Do you know how much sleep I could get if it weren't for all this back and forth mess??? I would just hate to miss anything.

25 or bust

ckinchen · #5 06-05-2012, 08:46 PM

Seems like it is about time to close this thread, the horse is dead. Most agree there was no study or true science involved in the reduction. The group is split on rather or not they should go back now and try to do something about it. Salty Cajun will only fight the oyster issue or weir management so I think we are done here unless you guys want to continue for 20 more pages which is fine as well. Those that want to do something about it will follow W to Baton Rouge and the rest of us will work in our office or at least be office fishermen and see how it goes.

Hopefuly W's political connection Dan Morrish his "family friend" does not take a stand on this against the increase or those of your following W will find yourselves alone on the front line. If history is an indicator he will do a 180 like he did on the oyster issue and fight against you guys. Of course he will never admit he changed sides, you just have to figure that out yourselves. Oh and let's not forget he is better than 99% of you, and you guys have no voice becuase you do not fish 15 or more days per month, not my words those are his, I think that covers it.

Thanks everyone for your contributions.

"W" · #6 06-05-2012, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckinchen

Seems like it is about time to close this thread, the horse is dead. Most agree there was no study or true science involved in the reduction. The group is split on rather or not they should go back now and try to do something about it. Salty Cajun will only fight the oyster issue or weir management so I think we are done here unless you guys want to continue for 20 more pages which is fine as well. Those that want to do something about it will follow W to Baton Rouge and the rest of us will work in our office or at least be office fishermen and see how it goes.

Hopefuly W's political connection Dan Morrish his "family friend" does not take a stand on this against the increase or those of your following W will find yourselves alone on the front line. If history is an indicator he will do a 180 like he did on the oyster issue and fight against you guys. Of course he will never admit he changed sides, you just have to figure that out yourselves.

Thanks everyone for your contributions.

Why would you close it??? Were making you buddy look like a idiot more and more

Or that mathgeek is the smartest person on this site

ckinchen · #7 06-05-2012, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W"

Why would you close it??? Were making you buddy look like a idiot more and more

Or that mathgeek is the smartest person on this site

Can you come up with some new material at least? We have to moderate all of this mess and after 20 pages I think "we" have covered everything.

Well everything except for your flip flop over your political friend and your role in the CCA board of directors immediately after the limit change. Other than that I think we are all clear.

"W" · #8 06-05-2012, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckinchen

Can you come up with some new material at least? We have to moderate all of this mess and after 20 pages I think "we" have covered everything.

Well everything except for your flip flop over your policies friend and your role in the CCA board of directors immediately after the limit change. Other than that I think we are all clear.

How about we put all the facts and documents on a new post and make it a sticky

Feesherman · #9 06-05-2012, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W"

How about we put all the facts and documents on a new post and make it a sticky

The only fact we have is that there was no biological data to support a limit reduction from 25 to 15. That is the only fact there is on this entire thread! And that's a fact! LOL

ckinchen · #10 06-05-2012, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W"

How about we put all the facts and documents on a new post and make it a sticky

No on that one, I have lost enough bandwidth on this thread, I will have to pay extra for this mess. I hope several of you upgrade to a premium membership for this entertainment, I have bills to pay....

Support Salty Cajun - Where else can you find Flipper the great = W. He has been banned from all of the other sites and he is our feature poster on the SC.

jdm4x43732 · #11 06-05-2012, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckinchen

Can you come up with some new material at least? We have to moderate all of this mess and after 20 pages I think "we" have covered everything.

Well everything except for your flip flop over your political friend and your role in the CCA board of directors immediately after the limit change. Other than that I think we are all clear.

I guess the boss has spoken

ckinchen · #12 06-05-2012, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdm4x43732

I guess the boss has spoken

Nah go ahead we can keep it open for a little longer, I have a busy day tomorrow so I may not be able to keep Mr. Obama I mean flipper, I mean W in line so someone has to take my spot. I have to go back to my office fishermen role.

Salty · #13 06-05-2012, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by "W"

Why would you close it??? Were making you buddy look like a idiot more and more

Or that mathgeek is the smartest person on this site

Well, one thing's for sure...he ain't the dumbest.

ckinchen · #14 06-05-2012, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Salty

Well, one thing's for sure...he ain't the dumbest.

Lol so who are you saying is?

Salty · #15 06-05-2012, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckinchen

Lol so who are you saying is?

You're smart enough to figure that one out.

Armand16 · #16 06-05-2012, 08:52 PM

I say continue, let it go on until it dies. I would also like to see a poll as to what people think about changing the limit back based on these recent discussions. Just to see what kinda progress ole W is makin.

ckinchen · #17 06-05-2012, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Armand16

I say continue, let it go on until it dies. I would also like to see a poll as to what people think about changing the limit back based on these recent discussions. Just to see what kinda progress ole W is makin.

I would suspect the majority still want to see the limit raised, generally speaking people are greedy and most people hate authority or regulation so in general keeping the limits the same would be a huge underdog from a poll standpoint. Although I would argue that has little to do with anything W has said. MathGeek maybe, W, probably not.