Thank You

["W"]

Originally Posted by ifsteve

From a purely scientific perspective I will give you my opinion and I am sure it will go over like a turn in a punch bowl with the keep em all crowd.

YES I believe that there should be some kind of limit with every game fish species. Lacking better evidence it is safer for the future to put on some reasonable restrictions. Again for species defined as game fish.

If you kill a fish it will not contribute to the future biomass. At some point overfishing is a possibility.

You must be from Texas ?

[Natural Light Kid]

What's Cheniere doing?

["W"]

Originally Posted by Natural Light Kid

What's Cheniere doing?

Chenier placed two reefs ( same as CCA )

They also donate lots of money to costal projects and will holding several meetings about the lake and what efforts they can do to help

Again More than CCA has done in a 10th of the years


Chenier is wide open to help wide open

[lsufish]

Originally Posted by "W"

Chenier placed two reefs ( same as CCA )

They also donate lots of money to costal projects and will holding several meetings about the lake and what efforts they can do to help

Again More than CCA has done in a 10th of the years


Chenier is wide open to help wide open

Your kidding! A for profit corporation who has to be held accountable and fully disclose all of their inner workings to shareholders, the government, sarbanes oxley, employees, and the general public is more efficient with allocation of resources than a bureaucratic non-profit? Shocking.

PS: W, while I believe you make valid points, your disdain for people that are only able to fish a few times a year will never allow people to fully support your cause. I hope you change your approach to something more productive.

["W"]

Originally Posted by lsufish

Your kidding! A for profit corporation who has to be held accountable and fully disclose all of their inner workings to shareholders, the government, sarbanes oxley, employees, and the general public is more efficient with allocation of resources than a bureaucratic non-profit? Shocking.

PS: W, while I believe you make valid points, your disdain for people that are only able to fish a few times a year will never allow people to fully support your cause. I hope you change your approach to something more productive.

You think the CCA is not a flow cash cow ??

Hell Raymond just said they had the best season ever which means they should be spending the most money ever right ???

[lsufish]

Originally Posted by "W"

You think the CCA is not a flow cash cow ??

Hell Raymond just said they had the best season ever which means they should be spending the most money ever right ???

You missed my point completely. I have no doubt CCA is a cash cow. My point was a for profit company will always use money and resources more efficiently than a non-profit/ government run agency because they have to. They are held to a higher level of accountability. Typically when an organization is delclared "non profit" people don't hold them to a high standard and complacency follows shorlty thereafter.

[The shop in Broussard]

Yall sound like a gang of libs!
Armed with good intentions, ignorance, and a false sense of moral superiority, your "contribution" to conservation is misguided at best and probably nefarious. I may be totally wrong, but its hard to take yall serious when you're complaining from way up on that high horse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

[hewes]

wheres Raymond? are you still thankful after 12 pages on your comment?

[Natural Light Kid]

Originally Posted by hewes

wheres Raymond? are you still thankful after 12 pages on your comment?

I agree

[Deadly D]

He is Rock Training his dogs now, he aint got time for this