15 Trout Limit Discussion PUBLIC

[ckinchen]

Originally Posted by "W"

....

Given what we have seen out of you W and your flip/flop on various issues you probably are not in a position to call anyone a democrat Mr. Obama sir.

Maybe he just knows how to go about getting things done and does not flip flop or call 99% of his supporters idiots like you did earlier. He might just be not only wealthier than you but smarter as well. Just a guess on my part, I could be wrong. We know he is taller.

[SULPHITE]

Originally Posted by BIG RED 1983
w thinks data is the little kid from the goonies

LMAO !!

[chasin'tail]

W, it's just the way the world goes. Your fight for limits to be put back to where they should be is one that, can't be won without some very high ups getting on-board. And I'm afraid that they have to much vested to reverse their mistake. We've seen the lake in it's prime and will most likely never experience that ability to catch the quality of fish that was once an everyday occurance. Now you really have to work to catch the 7, 8, 9 lbers. And I'm afraid that the rest of the state will be at the 15 fish limit sooner that later. YES, there is NO biological info to support the current limits. But that doesn't matter.
The matter of oyster fishing on the lake should only be allowed with tongs, it's really hard to move that much reef with them.

[ckinchen]

Originally Posted by chasin'tail

W, it's just the way the world goes. Your fight for limits to be put back to where they should be is one that, can't be won without some very high ups getting on-board. And I'm afraid that they have to much vested to reverse their mistake. We've seen the lake in it's prime and will most likely never experience that ability to catch the quality of fish that was once an everyday occurance. Now you really have to work to catch the 7, 8, 9 lbers. And I'm afraid that the rest of the state will be at the 15 fish limit sooner that later. YES, there is NO biological info to support the current limits. But that doesn't matter.
The matter of oyster fishing on the lake should only be allowed with tongs, it's really hard to move that much reef with them.

Well said. I would also support tong only oyster fishing.

[Wag]

Originally Posted by ckinchen

Well said. I would also support tong only oyster fishing.

Me too!

[Bluechip]

Originally Posted by ckinchen

Well said. I would also support tong only oyster fishing.

I would also.

["W"]

Originally Posted by chasin'tail

W, it's just the way the world goes. Your fight for limits to be put back to where they should be is one that, can't be won without some very high ups getting on-board. And I'm afraid that they have to much vested to reverse their mistake. We've seen the lake in it's prime and will most likely never experience that ability to catch the quality of fish that was once an everyday occurance. Now you really have to work to catch the 7, 8, 9 lbers. And I'm afraid that the rest of the state will be at the 15 fish limit sooner that later. YES, there is NO biological info to support the current limits. But that doesn't matter.
The matter of oyster fishing on the lake should only be allowed with tongs, it's really hard to move that much reef with them.

I agree but I also love that we showed the fishing community what a idiotic selfish greed by small few it really was

I have proven my point and I think you could call this thread a Win on limit the reduced limits

[weedeater]

Originally Posted by "W"

I agree but I also love that we showed the fishing community what a idiotic selfish greed by small few it really was

I have proven my point and I think you could call this thread a Win on limit the reduced limits

I can start a thread that Obama needs to be kicked out of office and probably get 100% to agree but that don't mean he is gonna be kicked out just like even if everyone on here agrees that the limit needs changed.... you ain't won nothin because the limit is still the same.

[Salty]

Originally Posted by weedeater

I can start a thread that Obama needs to be kicked out of office and probably get 100% to agree but that don't mean he is gonna be kicked out just like even if everyone on here agrees that the limit needs changed.... you ain't won nothin because the limit is still the same.

As a matter of "fact"...he's managed to make himself an even bigger loser.....if that's possible.

[Feesherman]

Originally Posted by "W"

I have proven my point and I think you could call this thread a Win on limit the reduced limits

I think you have a strong opinion and a nice theory but you have no facts or any scientific proof that the reduced limit is the cause of fewer big trout in the lake. Especially with the many variables in place now like oyster dredging and more fishing pressure. All that has to be taken into account. No scientific data suggested a reduced limit was neccesary and there is still no scientific data to suggest that it caused a reduced number of large trout.

[ckinchen]

Originally Posted by Feesherman

I think you have a strong opinion and a nice theory but you have no facts or any scientific proof that the reduced limit is the cause of fewer big trout in the lake. Especially with the many variables in place now like oyster dredging and more fishing pressure. All that has to be taken into account. No scientific data suggested a reduced limit was neccesary and there is still no scientific data to suggest that it caused a reduced number of large trout.

Exactly right, well said.

[adamsfence]

no you didn't read it it says that the live oysters on the north end supports marine life alot better than the destroyed reefs on the south ends. the north end has larger clusters and is able to support the stuff for the bait to eat.

[Smoke Shack BBQ]

Originally Posted by BIG RED 1983

w thinks data is the little kid from the goonies

Fwifty dawa bill, fwifty dawa bill!

Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk 2

[mcjaredsandwich]

What I find funniest about W complaining big lake is no longer a trophy lake....




When does W only go out after Big Female Trout?! I have never seen him post up pics or a report about targeting and catching one or two big girls, only how he has a deck full of 13" trout.


I think someone wants to have 50 fish instead of 30 fish so their internet penis will be bigger.


my .02

[jdm4x43732]

Originally Posted by mcjaredsandwich

What I find funniest about W complaining big lake is no longer a trophy lake....




When does W only go out after Big Female Trout?! I have never seen him post up pics or a report about targeting and catching one or two big girls, only how he has a deck full of 13" trout.


I think someone wants to have 50 fish instead of 30 fish so their internet penis will be bigger.


my .02

Now that is funny right there, I don't care who you are!

[Salty]

Originally Posted by mcjaredsandwich

What I find funniest about W complaining big lake is no longer a trophy lake....




When does W only go out after Big Female Trout?! I have never seen him post up pics or a report about targeting and catching one or two big girls, only how he has a deck full of 13" trout.


I think someone wants to have 50 fish instead of 30 fish so their internet penis will be bigger.


my .02

Yeah, and catch 'em before 8:00 am.

Unless W is soakin' bait in the channel in August, all the bigger fish he catches comes off them reefs with the 12-18'ers.

Keep in mind tho...he has stated that big trout are easy to catch and he can catch 'em anytime he wants.

One would think he could have managed one in any of those tourneys he's fished.

[1fastmerc]

Originally Posted by mcjaredsandwich

What I find funniest about W complaining big lake is no longer a trophy lake....




When does W only go out after Big Female Trout?! I have never seen him post up pics or a report about targeting and catching one or two big girls, only how he has a deck full of 13" trout.


I think someone wants to have 50 fish instead of 30 fish so their internet penis will be bigger.


my .02

That has to be one the funniest things I've heard all day. Lmbo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SGib]

Can those who target only large trout post up some pics? Or some numbers from the past years? Be very interesting to see.

[all star rod]

So W, serious question...
What is your goal / time frame on trying to get the limit changed back to 25....

[Salty]

IMO, Chicken should be responsible for coming up with another interesting topic of conversation "cents" he was the one that put the "breaks" on this one.