|
General Discussion (Everything Else) Discuss anything that doesn't belong in any other forums here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Pretty sure there will be ways around it. If not gates, levees, weirs, etc. Most of the big time land owners have plenty of pull, and Louisiana is about as political as it can get.
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Has everything to do with what was once land, that's the issue
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
no anchors ,no traps or nets. no tonging ,no power poles fishing lure does not destroy damage the bottom.
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I guess I will need multiple banks of batteries run in parallel to keep an ipilot running all day in anchor mode since we can?t use an anchor. LOL |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Who?s water are they using to fill up there canal ? States water They sure the hell ain?t bringing water hose and 5gall buckets to fill it up Again had zero to do with land It?s tidal water only .. 49 other states have zero issues but La seems to have it .. It?s simple If Gulf of Mexico waters move it we should be able to fish it State owns all tidal water If I?m sitting at Jetties and that same water 5 hours later goes in a marsh it don?t become private.. it?s still tidal waters owned by the state If land owners don?t want people fishing in marsh Levee it off and have zero tidal state waters on it It?s our fish shrimp oysters and crabs not the land owners !! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Waltrip's Saltwater Guide Service jeremy@geaux-outdoors.com https://m.facebook.com/waltrip.guideservice?id=148838538646862&_rdr |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This bill has added amendments to it already You need to get the updated version Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Waltrip's Saltwater Guide Service jeremy@geaux-outdoors.com https://m.facebook.com/waltrip.guideservice?id=148838538646862&_rdr |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I understand that no one owns water, and broken up coastal marsh is one thing. But, there are lots of marshes with only one or two ways in and out, and often times these ways are only there because the landowner dug a canal or trail on their LAND. That should not entitle everyone on earth to go into these marshes and do as they please. Hell, lots of these marshes are dead ends, which makes it tidal but not navigable. 50/50 on it passing, and if it does, I'd be willing to bet there will still be ways to keep people out. I'm not a landowner, and you know I mostly redfish, but I can't sit here and think that because I can get to someones land via way that they created, that I should just be able to go fish it. It's not a natural waterway at that point. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
No because most marshes have a main that is public canal If the start levee off from tidal flow it will be awesome Don?t have to worry about fish being on there ?private property ? Law states tidal water are owned by state of Louisiana No land owners If my state waters are over you land o damn well stop the flow . 49 states have this law in place We are only one who don?t It?s time for use to move into actin Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Waltrip's Saltwater Guide Service jeremy@geaux-outdoors.com https://m.facebook.com/waltrip.guideservice?id=148838538646862&_rdr |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Or Coastal erosion projects on private marshes Like they said at meeting We need to defund the coastal marsh projects if we can?t benefit from it . Using our tax dollars to save Mr Oil Mans land and marsh Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Waltrip's Saltwater Guide Service jeremy@geaux-outdoors.com https://m.facebook.com/waltrip.guideservice?id=148838538646862&_rdr |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
I think it sucks.
Also a reason I don't donate to certain organizations that will use that money on private land, but at least I have a choice in that matter. How do you feel about the fact that the landowners pay property taxes on the land that said canal is on, and the public doesn't? Lots of marsh out there without taxpayer paid canals. |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
I love the gate we have across our deer lease canal. it keeps the idiots out of there so I can enjoy the land I lease without seeing a bunch of sqatters and litterbugs. if you were seeing this through my eyes you would agree.
it must suck to have the poors. lol |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Ain't you got guns to be builted in the dust bowl of Texas?
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Please explain to me what kinks need to be worked out ? It?s pretty simple It works fine in Texas so why would it not work here ! The power of people made a pretty bold statement and I personally spoke with two state senators who said they were really impressed with the showing of anglers support for this bill . One who was opposed but now had change of heart and is for it . Other will be a vote in House Only ones who are worried are duck hunters thinking people are going to mess them up and it?s going to be law that it will be off limits during waterfowl season . They need to use there BIg Money and levee there land from title waters Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Waltrip's Saltwater Guide Service jeremy@geaux-outdoors.com https://m.facebook.com/waltrip.guideservice?id=148838538646862&_rdr |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Because there is no specific wording that will allow you to fish those waters. They?re tricking the publIc while appeasing the big land owners. Typical politics. |
Bookmarks |
|
|