|
General Discussion (Everything Else) Discuss anything that doesn't belong in any other forums here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Employers reasonably assume drug offenders tend to be less motivated and less likely to follow company rules than non-offenders. A job candidate with a drug history has a higher burden of proof that they are different. In addition to the above considerations, another good way to put a single drug offense in the past is some renewed training or education. Some glowing trainer/instructor recommendations goes a long way too. |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Anecdotal and he's white
Spiral Out |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Hispanic. And one counter example is sufficient to disprove your completely general claim that one drug conviction shuts down employment.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Not shuts it down but makes it hard. Science disproves just about everything you say regarding drugs.
Spiral Out |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
So is you example mowing grass or building houses for a living?
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Back to the original subject. I'm seeing poor judgement on both sides here. From what I read, they were on an EMS run, now I'm sure the police officer could have handled it better but why block a road for a Medical?
We have a good working relationship with our PD here in Lafayette but it takes both sides working together and a little bit of common sense! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
My example got a job in the credit department of a major department store. Worked hard, moved up into management, made good money last I heard.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|