STAR Adv Trout size decline

["W"]

Took the Top 3 trout from each year -2001 (NO WEIGHTS LISTED)

[PotLikinisAhabbit]

Whats the p- value?

[Lake Chuck Duck]

2000 pound trout?

[PotLikinisAhabbit]

Im not real sure what an "adv. weight" is but 2000-2012lbs seems about right

[PotLikinisAhabbit]

i guess with the coming of our lord and savior in year one, speckled trout populations were pretty healthy

[simplepeddler]

This could be because there are TOO MANY fish.
an eco system will support so many POUNDS of fish per surface area of water......you can have ten ten pounders or 100 one pounders.........

[Duck Butter]

What McJared said p-value bro

Post up the top 3 or 5 or 7 whatever trout 'waits' for each year. You can easily plug that into MS Excel and get a graph and figure out if those weights are statistically significant. MathGeek can probably do it in his head This would actually be something worth doing. Post em up and see what we can figger out.

I would bet its not statistically significant with a p-value set at 0.05.


I saw you have the waits in another thread, i will try and run the numbers in a bit

[PotLikinisAhabbit]

I would run the numbers but I'm very curious as to what he comes up with. Better hope wikipedia has relevant material lol

[Duck Butter]

I just looked at the website, and to be equal:

1. you would have to start the test at 2003 because prior to that the category was just east/west speckled trout and doesn't list where they were 'wade'. I am sure W knows 1000% which of those fish came from Big Lake. So, you are only looking at 2 years pre-hurricane data and comparing that to 6 or 7 years of post-hurricane data so probably not the best set of numbers to compare

2. You would have to only use the top 3 because some years only show 3



Just from looking at the numbers, the East side winning 'wait' appears to have gone down, but there was no limit change over there, so....?
Those numbers should be ran also just to see if there is any significant difference if they actually can be figured. The divisions keep changing and it may not be possible to compare.

["W"]

Originally Posted by PotLikinisAhabbit

I would run the numbers but I'm very curious as to what he comes up with. Better hope wikipedia has relevant material lol

you go ahead and run that......Im fogged in offshore but not that board

["W"]

Originally Posted by Duck Butter

I just looked at the website, and to be equal:

1. you would have to start the test at 2003 because prior to that the category was just east/west speckled trout and doesn't list where they were 'wade'. I am sure W knows 1000% which of those fish came from Big Lake. So, you are only looking at 2 years pre-hurricane data and comparing that to 6 or 7 years of post-hurricane data so probably not the best set of numbers to compare

2. You would have to only use the top 3 because some years only show 3



Just from looking at the numbers, the East side winning 'wait' appears to have gone down, but there was no limit change over there, so....?
Those numbers should be ran also just to see if there is any significant difference if they actually can be figured. The divisions keep changing and it may not be possible to compare.

2002 west is all big lake trout

[Duck Butter]

Originally Posted by "W"

2002 west is all big lake trout

If that graph represented LNG stock, what would you do?

["W"]

Originally Posted by Duck Butter

If that graph represented LNG stock, what would you do?

Sold in 2004 but LNG stock looks way better than this trout