Thank You

[T-TOP]

GCCA is now CCA.... You guys should know this, changed the name to include east and west coast.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[simplepeddler]

Originally Posted by keakar

try again, learn your history and stop repeating false information, CCA had absolutely nothing to do with banning gill nets and didn't even exist then.

that was GCCA and I was a proud member of THAT organization because they DID work on behalf of helping fishermen and the environment unlike the CCA that was created years after the ban was passed and even to this day lives off of the false claim that they helped ban gill nets. they want people to falsely assume this and will not do anything but encourage this false narrative that helps them raise money.

CCA is not and never had anything to do with GCCA, they just used the CCA name so they could take credit for what things GCCA did to help fishermen knowing full well most people would confuse the two and think they were the same organization just as you assumed.

That don't sound right..........I thought they changed the name of the original orginization?

["W"]

Originally Posted by simplepeddler

Buddy I've been around here a while.....and many time agree with "W".....many times.....dubya knows that......

"W" it's simple math........you being the Stock Market guru know simple math.....

You hand over your limit..............to guys who take thier limit......equals too many limits per fisherman.........you have been bragging on banging limits out........

I asked.......do you send your limits home with the sports?

I send limts home with everyone !! Today I gave the guy who runs the landing 6o trout filets because it was a scout trip

And it was perfect legal to carry them home !!


Let me ask you this ; does it matter if I give my legal limit to a person or feed it to the hardheades ?

Can you tell me how anyone can speak for me on what I do with my limit of fish?

[simplepeddler]

The diiference is the client Dub........you are smart enough to know that........

[specknation]

A lot of the guides are down in total trout catches statewide, so let's hang CCA from a flag pole. Understand I am not a CCA member, but blaming them for a subpar trout season is just WRONG and for lack of better term just stupid.

[simplepeddler]

Originally Posted by "W"

I send limts home with everyone !! Today I gave the guy who runs the landing 6o trout filets because it was a scout trip

And it was perfect legal to carry them home !!


Let me ask you this ; does it matter if I give my legal limit to a person or feed it to the hardheades ?

Can you tell me how anyone can speak for me on what I do with my limit of fish?

you make a valid point........your limit is yours to do with as you wish......finally an arguable point........now feeding them to the hardheads is wanton waste and against the law...........but I know you embelished out of wanting to win the argument

["W"]

Originally Posted by T-TOP

GCCA is now CCA.... You guys should know this, changed the name to include east and west coast.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No no No No No

This was a whole diffrent organization not even ran by the same system !!

GCCA was branched for The Gulf coast only

Once they were not funded heavy they then hired all these bootleggers and turned it into a money making operation

They have a great read on both and how it became somewhere on the web , think it was posted on RodnReel.com a year or so ago


They were two different teams

["W"]

Originally Posted by simplepeddler

The diiference is the client Dub........you are smart enough to know that........

So explain how it makes it any diffrent ?

If I give you my fish or a guy who just paid me $600?

["W"]

Originally Posted by specknation

A lot of the guides are down in total trout catches statewide, so let's hang CCA from a flag pole. Understand I am not a CCA member, but blaming them for a subpar trout season is just WRONG and for lack of better term just stupid.

I just had a 250 comment Facebook debate this week

The east side still blames BP for slow trout fishing
Lmao

I bet less than 1% of any trout alive during the oil spill is still alive

[eman]

Actually the net ban was pushed by SOS. (save our specks) Before they banded w/ other states to become GCCA. I was a volunteer back then. After the gill nets were banned then cca came along. CCA had NOTHING to do w/ the ban on gill nets,

[OnePunchRex]

Originally Posted by simplepeddler

The diiference is the client Dub........you are smart enough to know that........

Evidently not

[simplepeddler]

and.........I think your are splitting hairs on the "perfectly" legal..........I know fish have traditionally not been a huge topic of enforcement....but ducks on the other hand........you damn well better have your toast together.

With the intensity of the ARS..........we are going to see more and more enforcement where you are not going to be easily able to split hairs

[simplepeddler]

Originally Posted by eman

Actually the net ban was pushed by SOS. (save our specks) Before they banded w/ other states to become GCCA. I was a volunteer back then. After the gill nets were banned then cca came along. CCA had NOTHING to do w/ the ban on gill nets,

names changed
did leadership?

[simplepeddler]

Originally Posted by "W"

I just had a 250 comment Facebook debate this week

The east side still blames BP for slow trout fishing
Lmao

I bet less than 1% of any trout alive during the oil spill is still alive

oil spill affected habitat maybe?

[simplepeddler]

Originally Posted by "W"

So explain how it makes it any diffrent ?

If I give you my fish or a guy who just paid me $600?

this is exactly the "grey" area that is being targeted for clarity

[hewes]

leadership changed

[T-TOP]

Originally Posted by "W"

No no No No No



This was a whole diffrent organization not even ran by the same system !!



GCCA was branched for The Gulf coast only



Once they were not funded heavy they then hired all these bootleggers and turned it into a money making operation



They have a great read on both and how it became somewhere on the web , think it was posted on RodnReel.com a year or so ago





They were two different teams

I would like to read it. I remember when they took the G off the sticker.. Same logo just took the G off and kept the CCA. I had some of the old stickers for years after..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

["W"]

Originally Posted by simplepeddler

and.........I think your are splitting hairs on the "perfectly" legal..........I know fish have traditionally not been a huge topic of enforcement....but ducks on the other hand........you damn well better have your toast together.

With the intensity of the ARS..........we are going to see more and more enforcement where you are not going to be easily able to split hairs

You are 100% right ducks are a whole diffrent ball game

But fish are not

I actually believe the whole state including big lake goes by the 25 fish possession law
Not 100% on that but I think I read that a person can have up to 2 daily possession limits (25per person) which means if true 50 cleaned trout per person instead of 30 state wide

I will have to recheck but I believe it's read like that

[keakar]

Originally Posted by hewes

leadership changed

the leadership didn't change, the leaders are different because they are NOT the same and never have had ANYTHING to do with each other.

GCCA disbanded, shut down, closed the doors, called it quits because it was all volunteer and run by donations but after the gill net ban was put in place funding dried up and they disbanded. then CCA came along and saw they could make money while "claiming" to be working on behalf of sportsmen and they started telling people they just changed the name because it made people more willing to donate knowing they had done something already. this lie was started years ago and lives on today strong as ever and only the people who used to belong to GCCA know and remember the truth.

if you tell a lie long enough people believe its true and this is how this false idea that just because they used the same letters it must be the same organization but the Gulf Coast Conservation Association GCCA is in no way, manor, shape, or form, related to the Coastal Conservation Association CCA.

they only used the same letters to mislead people and lay false claim to the accomplishments of a completely different organization then CCA

CCA has no more claim to the gill net ban then me saying I personally got gill nets banned all on my own without any help from anyone or any organization. CCA's claim to banning gill nets is no more truthful then mine

["W"]

Originally Posted by T-TOP

I would like to read it. I remember when they took the G off the sticker.. Same logo just took the G off and kept the CCA. I had some of the old stickers for years after..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I will try to find it this week , almost sure it was on RodnReel

It was way more than taking he G off I promise

Like they said it was all new leadership change and went from almost zero politics to 100% politics in matter of a year



CCA is like Eron

You pay for a fee and you have a chance to get someone in return ( if lucky ) but all the profits are not posted public and you never see any progression

Without the lottery STAR CCA is nothing


They have a great money scheme in place to collect with little to none overhead