|
Inshore Saltwater Fishing Discussion Discuss inshore fishing, tackle, and tactics here! |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
So, what was said about the Black Bass regulations on the Sabine River?
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
OK ....... then what stamp were you talking about when you said:
"kinda like our stamp money going to DU", and "But duck hunters that do not support DU are forced to buy a stamp that the proceeds are given to DU"? I'm only aware of 2 stamps relevant to the conversation: the federal Duck Stamp and the LA state Duck Stamp. The proceeds of neither go to DU. Your posts exhibited a fairly common misconception, which is why I took the opportunity to address it. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
So you're saying that 0 federal dollars from the sale of fed duck stamps are "granted" to DU?
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Isn't that what he said? You even quoted it. lol |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
See for yourself at: https://www.fws.gov/birds/get-involv...rs-at-work.php |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
First rule of debating; Never ask a question you don't already know the answer to. If you need an example, see Trey Gowdy.
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
NAWCA money ...... certainly; WRP ...... absolutely; but you'll need to educate me on how DU gets federal duck stamp money. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah prove it!!!!!!!
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
NAWCA
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Not funded by federal duck stamp money. I just spent 2 years serving as the MS Flyway representative to the NAWCA Staff scoring, ranking, and creating project slates for NAWCA funding, so I'm real familiar with the process.
Google NAWCA and you can see for yourself the funding sources: appropriations, interest on federal aid (Pittman-Robertson) money, mig bird treaty act fines, small engine taxes from the Breaux Act, and for the last 5 years by a 1-time $100-million payment from the BP oil spill restoration funds. Last edited by Lreynolds; 07-08-2016 at 02:25 PM. |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Like I said, layers of bureaucracy
You can spin it any way you want but our duck stamp money goes to the Dept of Interior (the Feds), and the Feds grant DU. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The first rule of debate should be to actually know what you are talking about. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Typical government BS. Their accounting gets a little confusing sometimes.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Actually, why not get straight to the point and ***** about P-R. I mean, it can't possibly be a good thing if our tax dollars are going to DU. Forget everything else it does. GET RID OF IT!! Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
No, I just think you're a whiny idiot. I'm not even a DU member anymore, but it doesn't change the fact that I've seen the work they've done in this state, and I've seen organizations that are far worse than DU when it comes to what they do (or don't do) for the resource they work with or the people they work for.
Plus, I just find it pathetic that you are whining about one, little stamp when there is a tax that probably puts more money in DU's hands than any duck stamp does. And that $25 that you spend on a duck stamp? That probably pales in comparison to what you pay in P-R taxes every year. Oh, and let's not forget the broken record you sound like when you bring this dumb **** up every 3 or 4 months. Give it a rest already. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Lm@o man you really need to calm down! It's just the Internet, don't let me all the way in your head like that. You're making it way too easy for me
Oh and if I was a real idiot, I'd be happy about paying taxes on top of taxes that go to self serving private lobbyists masquerading as non-profit organizations and then brag about it on the Internet. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Anyway, since this thread was thoroughly disrailed, anyone know how the red snapper discussion went Thursday?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk |
Bookmarks |
|
|