SaltyCajun.com

SaltyCajun.com (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/index.php)
-   Inshore Saltwater Fishing Discussion (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   West Cove Marsh (http://www.saltycajun.com/forum/showthread.php?t=17285)

dances_with_reds 03-20-2011 09:49 PM

West Cove Marsh
 
Anyone get back into the marsh this weekend? Thinking of going tomorrow and wondered if there was enough water back there and if the water looked good...

boatdriver 03-21-2011 07:19 PM

Be aware of the boundries...
 
Just be careful you don't get caught on someone else's property. Lots of private property south of the cove. Just beware of who owns what. Just giving you a heads up.

BD

RAGINJROB 03-21-2011 07:53 PM

Thought that was all Sabine Marsh?

boatdriver 03-21-2011 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RAGINJROB (Post 237119)
Thought that was all Sabine Marsh?

It's all Sabine refuge on the very west side of the cove. The only public cuts you can legally fish are the 3 on the north bank of the cove. Every cut on the south bank is owned by Apache. But, all the marsh bordering Oyster Lake is private owned or leased.

RAGINJROB 03-21-2011 09:12 PM

Thanks.. that's what I was referring to. Marsh off the W Cove canal

copperbass 03-25-2011 08:48 PM

I know a person /company etc. can own or lease land or a land locked pond or lake but how can anyone own or lease free flowing water that belongs to everyone?

Capt.B 03-25-2011 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by copperbass (Post 238629)
I know a person /company etc. can own or lease land or a land locked pond or lake but how can anyone own or lease free flowing water that belongs to everyone?

It's not the water ways they lease its the area in which the water ways travel that they lease...they set boundries and that area is private property just as if you would be on a duck lease or a deer lease. Except in Cameron parish they do not have to put up fence nor do they have to place posted signs. And they don't take "I didn't know" to kindly....but as a Padna of mine said "they'd have to catch me!!:p:D"j/j lmao

Ray 03-26-2011 10:14 AM

Navigable waterways are different than man made canals.
Canals on private land are private property.
Navigable waterways are mostly natural rivers and lakes or some man made bodies of water like Toledo Bend and the Tenn/Tom Waterway, Erie Canal, Intercoaster Canal...

In La, the landowner has rights to the land all the way to the mean low water mark. So if the navigable waterway waters go over the land owners land, you cannot fish that water. In other states, you can fish the waters, no matter how far it goes onto private property.

Keywest18 03-26-2011 08:11 PM

so what your saying is he just owns it to the low tide level?so say during high tide it went over his property and that was the only way to pass you couldnt?forgive me if that sounds stupid but im not familiar with la regulations just yet

boatdriver 03-26-2011 08:30 PM

In LA, you can actually put a gate across a waterway. Navigable or manmade. Lots of private marshes west of Hackberry have them. And to answer your question Cody, legally, you would be tresspassing. But, I'm sure if you were honest and just passing through, it wouldn't be a problem.

Keywest18 03-26-2011 08:35 PM

oh wow thats ridiculous,i dont think ill have a problem with that i wont make it far enough out,i bet theyd make a killing if they took tolls lol

Ray 03-27-2011 08:15 AM

There are a lot of gates across private canals on Black Bayou, but never seen one across a navigable waterway. That is not legal. You have to be able to navigate.
Only people who can cut off a navigable waterway is a gov't service. Not private individuals.
Maybe a natural waterway, but not a navigable waterway.

Ray 03-27-2011 08:19 AM

In the latest, and one of the most significant, challenges to angler access in recent years, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana has ruled that anglers do not have the state or federal common law right to fish and hunt on the Mississippi River up to the high-water mark when it floods privately owned land.
In Parm v. Shumate (Civil Action No. 01-2624), Normal Parm, Jr., and four others were fishing a section of the Mississippi River between the ordinary high- and low-water marks when the owner of the adjacent land, Walker Cottonwood Farms, contacted the local sheriff and had Parm arrested and charged with trespass.
The court found that although Walker Cottonwood Farms' privately owned property (the area between the ordinary low and ordinary high stage of water) is subject to public use because it is a bank of the Mississippi River, fishing and hunting were not among the permitted uses. Only those "activities that are incidental to the navigable character of the Mississippi River and its enjoyment as an avenue of commerce" are permitted.
This would include "all legitimate purposes of travel or transportation, for boating or sailing for pleasure, as well as for carrying persons or property for hire," but not for fishing or hunting. An appeal to the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is planned, and BASS, with the help of our partners in conservation, has taken a leadership role to protect your rights to fish on public waters.

bluewing 03-28-2011 11:37 PM

It pretty bad around leeville and grand isle marsh too.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - [ARG:3 UNDEFINED], Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
All content, images, designs, and logos are Copyright © 2009-2012,
Salty Cajun, LLC
No unathorized use is permitted