Structurescan & Big Lake?
I've heard a lot of people talk about how structurescan technology is useless for shallow water fishing. A lot of times they are talking super skinny water. Does anyone use it on big lake and feel it's worth the cost? If you use it where do you find it most usefull? is it usable in say turners?
|
Quote:
|
Im sure the cone will be more narrow but im like you jpeff it has to help some. But not owning it or having used it i dont know.
|
IMO waist for big lake
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Most of the time u can see a reef on a regular depth finder. Also find fish at rigs with regular finders. Structure scans are pretty cool tho
|
Quote:
- W :grinpimp: |
Quote:
Pros use these things in 2' of water and they are able to find structure and ditches.... Best advice I have lol. My conclusion is if you are trying to find structure to fish without running on top of it, get the side imaging. It would also help keeping your boat at the right distance away from it. |
I fish with 6' 8 rods and can feel the bottom in every spot and reef.on the lake!!
Most good fisherman find fish by looking at the surface not the bottom |
In freshwater fishing yes they are a tremendous help. But on biglake there no use for them really. Like W said 90% of fish are found by looking at the surface of the water not the bottom.
|
They work on Big Lake.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk |
I've never used structurescan, but I do occasionally use the side imaging feature on my humminbird. I've been using it for a couple years now and I have found a few reefs in big lake and sabine lake while using it. I will admit though, I don't aimlessly drive around with my side scan on and hope I find something. While in shallow water, I usually see something on the surface that draws my attention to check it out with side imaging. For instance, a slick. I'll see a slick in the middle of big lake, catch fish on it, then check out my side imaging and see if the fish are holding on a reef there or if they are just feeding on moving bait. If there is indeed a reef, I'm able to mark it in detail because of the accuracy that my side imaging affords me. Mostly, I've been able to dial in the reefs I already like to fish and now I understand them better by being able to see them in photo quality. Same goes for some of the deeper water spots I fish. I don't know how structure scan will work in shallow water, but I do like my side imaging. Do I absolutely need it? No. Am I glad I have it? Definitely. Do I use it? Occasionally...I find myself fishing in more new water now that I have it and I've learned a lot since I bought it. I know you're talking structurescan and my experience is only with sidescan, but they both do similar things. Just thought I would chip in my 2 cents
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sorry I guess I'm not cool because I don't need to see ever bump or hump in water |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - [ARG:3 UNDEFINED], Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
All content, images, designs, and logos are Copyright © 2009-2012,
Salty Cajun, LLC
No unathorized use is permitted