Getting neighbors onboard with big buck mgmt

[Smalls]

I don't really see what any of this has to do with deer, but I'll go ahead an entertain you, if I must.

Put simply:

No to increased red snapper regulation. Simple answer: back it up with science. If you don't have science to impose stricter limits, don't impose them.

No to the global warming thing. I've had to study climate change in a few trainings I've done, and there has been a history of warming and cooling. It's a natural cycle the planet goes through. Was that way for a long time before any of us got here.

As far as the dead zone goes, I'm not as up on that as you may be. I've studied it in a few different classes and here or there reading different things, but I'm not going to offer an opinion on it without really knowing what I'm talking about on that subject.

I agree with your assessment of the explosive well removals as well. Not really a fan of that.

So what point are you trying to make exactly? Is it about basing regulatory decisions on science, because I definitely haven't said anything contrary to that. Maybe I wasn't clear with my view of deer harvest numbers (that is what this thread is about, right? Not all this other off topic matter that you keep dragging into this?). I am not suggesting that they should be lowered without scientific proof. If you got that impression, my apologies.