Quote:
Do you oppose additional restrictions on hunting with lead?
|
Sure, it doesn't harm anything to deer hunt or squirrel hunt with lead. Last I checked, squirrels and deer don't forage in the same manner as ducks, where the real potential is for harm. I'm not going to get into the whole lead issue though.
Quote:
Do you oppose unnecessary restrictions on RKBA while hunting? (Like the ban on handguns while bow hunting, and the ban on even possessing lead shot while waterfowl hunting.)
|
Yes. As for the lead comment, see above.
Quote:
Did you oppose the tripletail limit?
|
In all honesty, It's not something I paid much attention to because I don't fish for them. I'm not going to give an answer on that, because I did not read up on it and I do not know the entire story behind it.
Quote:
Do you think 15 pages of deer regs is way too much and think they should be reduced to five?
|
You just keep up with this one don't you? I just looked at the regs, and its only 8 pages long for deer hunting. Granted, you do have a good section on public lands, but each public land is managed differently, so that is warranted, in my opinion.
You want my opinion? Ok. You whine too much about deer hunting regulations.
Quote:
Did you think the big reward for the Whooping Crane was ridiculous?
|
Yet again, you show ignorance to a subject. How many times has it been pointed out that that reward was largely private money? The original reward from Operation Game Thief was $1,000. Then private funds were added to that.
Quote:
Do you think the limit on specks in big lake should be changed back to 25 trout?
|
If the science points that way, sure. Depends on the management objective.
Quote:
You prove my point when you dodge questions like the above list. Like gun grabbers who favor "reasonable restrictions" while claiming to support the 2nd amendment, big gov't conservationists claim to favor small gov't and be just like the little guy. You claim to be "just like I describe myself" but your actual policy preferences are much different.
|
When have I dodged any questions? When have I suggested anything to the contrary of what I have said? You read more into what I've said that what I actually said.
Go back and find anything that suggests that I'm in favor of more restrictions. Stating that a harvest limit is too high for a certain area is not the same as saying "lead should be outlawed". Quit kidding yourself. It's not the same.
I've never suggested that I think LDWF policies are flawless. Quite the contrary actually, since I've repeated stated my displeasure with their methodology of setting seasons and bag limits.