Answering the Libertarian argument for drug legalization

[MathGeek]

[hawgsquatch]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

Where's the paiute and toad likkin? Toad likkin is big round here. Piloscybin mushrooms? Hows about sprayin RAID onto a plate glass window scraping it off and smoking that. I come into contact with a bunch of interesting recreational drug techniques in my job here. Ever hear of a skittle party. Hows about huffing starter fluid or chainsaw gas. Freebasing Pufferfish sperm? Kids getting hit by cars because they are licking the exaust residue off off highway bumps? Electrical transformer fluid soaked cigarettes? Ketamine cupcakes? Hows about the old prison trick of fermenting one's poo and pee pee in a plastic bag and then huffing the methane gas? I bet some of you Roughnecks out there have made some PRUNO AKA cell wine.

I hate to admit it, but people will always seek enlightenment, entertainment and fun through beter chemistry.

And W,

If you are going to use meme's to make a point, don't pick the guys who became cultural icons and millionaires because they embraced weed. That right there is counterproductive, lol.

I have seen studies where they took a poll of high school kids and one of college kids about drug use, porn, and irresponsible sex. High school kids recorded higher on drug use and sex because they perceive it as cool and lie on the polls. In college, by the junior year irresponsible sex is bad and so is drugs but the porn is more accepted. By the time that they have taken the mandatory human sexuality classes the porn ranks at the top because it is now a socially accepted activity and they have been away from mom and dad for three years. Polls really prove nothing.

[AceArcher]

Originally Posted by hawgsquatch

Where's the paiute and toad likkin? Toad likkin is big round here. Piloscybin mushrooms? Hows about sprayin RAID onto a plate glass window scraping it off and smoking that. I come into contact with a bunch of interesting recreational drug techniques in my job here. Ever hear of a skittle party. Hows about huffing starter fluid or chainsaw gas. Freebasing Pufferfish sperm? Kids getting hit by cars because they are licking the exaust residue off off highway bumps? Electrical transformer fluid soaked cigarettes? Ketamine cupcakes? Hows about the old prison trick of fermenting one's poo and pee pee in a plastic bag and then huffing the methane gas? I bet some of you Roughnecks out there have made some PRUNO AKA cell wine.

I hate to admit it, but people will always seek enlightenment, entertainment and fun through beter chemistry.

And W,

If you are going to use meme's to make a point, don't pick the guys who became cultural icons and millionaires because they embraced weed. That right there is counterproductive, lol.

I have seen studies where they took a poll of high school kids and one of college kids about drug use, porn, and irresponsible sex. High school kids recorded higher on drug use and sex because they perceive it as cool and lie on the polls. In college, by the junior year irresponsible sex is bad and so is drugs but the porn is more accepted. By the time that they have taken the mandatory human sexuality classes the porn ranks at the top because it is now a socially accepted activity and they have been away from mom and dad for three years. Polls really prove nothing.

Careful hawg, can't use to much rational thought around here backed by scientific evidence. Someone's going to accuse you being a crazed meth freak at any moment.

Freebasing pufferfish sperm???? please tell me your joking right? because most of the rest of the stuff i have actually heard about before... but that would just be wrong.

lol

[eman]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

So this shows that 12th graders abuse pharmaceuticals more than marijuana? 39.4% pills vs 36.4%marijuana.

[mcjaredsandwich]

Originally Posted by eman

So this shows that 12th graders abuse pharmaceuticals more than marijuana? 39.4% pills vs 36.4%marijuana.

[bgizzle]

Originally Posted by eman

So this shows that 12th graders abuse pharmaceuticals more than marijuana? 39.4% pills vs 36.4%marijuana.

Correct. Graphs don't lie!

[MathGeek]

Originally Posted by eman

So this shows that 12th graders abuse pharmaceuticals more than marijuana? 39.4% pills vs 36.4%marijuana.

Abuse of pharmaceuticals is a real problem than needs to be addressed. But this analysis in the pills vs. marijuana is flawed.

If you add the "synthetic marijuana" to the "marijuana" you get 47.7% for marijuana, and if you add the percentages correctly for the pills you get 37.4%.

[Clampy]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

Abuse of pharmaceuticals is a real problem than needs to be addressed. But this analysis in the pills vs. marijuana is flawed.

If you add the "synthetic marijuana" to the "marijuana" you get 47.7% for marijuana, and if you add the percentages correctly for the pills you get 37.4%.

You do realize that fake weed only exist b/c real stuff is illegal right ?

["W"]

Originally Posted by Clampy

You do realize that fake weed only exist b/c real stuff is illegal right ?

You do realize fake weed is illegal also right?

[Clampy]

Originally Posted by "W"

You do realize fake weed is illegal also right?

What's your point ?

All they do is change a molecule and BOOM not illegal.
They come out with new ones every week.

["W"]

Originally Posted by Clampy

What's your point ?

All they do is change a molecule and BOOM not illegal.
They come out with new ones every week.

Wrong, you better read up on the laws!! It cover any synthetic type drugs.
Dont care how many chemicals you change its still illegal!!

[tim3516]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

Abuse of pharmaceuticals is a real problem than needs to be addressed. But this analysis in the pills vs. marijuana is flawed.

If you add the "synthetic marijuana" to the "marijuana" you get 47.7% for marijuana, and if you add the percentages correctly for the pills you get 37.4%.

The fact that it is SYNTHETIC tells you that it is not marijuana.

[AceArcher]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

Well color me impressed, After 20 pages of nonsense, you have finally linked a real study, that's both current, and in some senses supports your viewpoints that cannabis should remain illegal. Dang, it is true even a blind bird finds a worm every once in a while.

You did however omit some crucial portions of the study. Namely this chart and the fact that both Cigarette use and Alcohol use have been dropping. It's my position that these abuses are decreasing because they are legal, regulated, and thereby kept out of the hands of teens.

Thus again driving home the exact point, that legalization and regulation are the only way in which you keep drugs out of the hands of teens.

Thanks MG, didn't realize you had flipped sides and joined our liberalist cause.

[MathGeek]

Originally Posted by AceArcher

You did however omit some crucial portions of the study. Namely this chart and the fact that both Cigarette use and Alcohol use have been dropping. It's my position that these abuses are decreasing because they are legal, regulated, and thereby kept out of the hands of teens.

I think the increased regulation of alcohol and tobacco have played an important role in reducing use by teens, both in showing teens that society believes they are dangerous and because their use has been more tightly restricted since the late 1980s.

Recall that the drinking age has been raised from 18 to 21 in most states over this period. This means that almost no high school students may legally buy alcohol, but it also raises the access bar because other parties supplying alcohol to teens need to be 21 to legally purchase. I would be curious to know if the libertarian-minded advocates of marijuana legalization are hoping to put the access age at 18 or 21. Your analogy argument with alcohol ("legalization would reduce teen access") is only valid if you intend to make the age of access 21. Drunk driving laws are also tighter and more strictly enforced, with much stiffer penalties for those under 21 driving under the influence.

Public smoking has also come under much tighter restrictions in the US over the past 20 years, and several states have raised their ages for legal purchase.

[Clampy]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

I think the increased regulation of alcohol and tobacco have played an important role in reducing use by teens, both in showing teens that society believes they are dangerous and because their use has been more tightly restricted since the late 1980s.

Recall that the drinking age has been raised from 18 to 21 in most states over this period. This means that almost no high school students may legally buy alcohol, but it also raises the access bar because other parties supplying alcohol to teens need to be 21 to legally purchase. I would be curious to know if the libertarian-minded advocates of marijuana legalization are hoping to put the access age at 18 or 21. Your analogy argument with alcohol ("legalization would reduce teen access") is only valid if you intend to make the age of access 21. Drunk driving laws are also tighter and more strictly enforced, with much stiffer penalties for those under 21 driving under the influence.

Public smoking has also come under much tighter restrictions in the US over the past 20 years, and several states have raised their ages for legal purchase.

They believe its dangerous because Alcohol and tobacco are toxic and addictive.
It's not enforcement that slowed it down it's education.
Of course the legal age for cannabis would be 21 years of age no ones advocating recreational use for kids.

[MathGeek]

Originally Posted by Clampy

Of course the legal age for cannabis would be 21 years of age no ones advocating recreational use for kids.

Two voters in the poll have advocated reducing penalties for access to minors.

In post #281, Goooh wrote that weed being illegal for Tryann Mathieu (20 at the time Les Miles kicked him off the team) was the cause of his woes rather than the negative effects of cannabis on teenagers.

The inference that marijuana should not have been illegal for the 20 year old was clear.

Maybe some LSU fans did not realize that Tryann Mathieu was only 20 when Les Miles kicked him off of the team and when (two months later) he got into trouble with the law for possession.

All those who really think cannabis use should remain illegal for all teenagers can go ahead and positively affirm the statement:

The athletic and legal consequences for Tryann Mathieu were completely reasonable because he was only 20 at the time and cannabis use should have been illegal for him! He should have known better. I hope drug laws remain strictly enforced for teenagers!

[Clampy]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

Two voters in the poll have advocated reducing penalties for access to minors.

In post #281, Goooh wrote that weed being illegal for Tryann Mathieu (20 at the time Les Miles kicked him off the team) was the cause of his woes rather than the negative effects of cannabis on teenagers.

The inference that marijuana should not have been illegal for the 20 year old was clear.

Maybe some LSU fans did not realize that Tryann Mathieu was only 20 when Les Miles kicked him off of the team and when (two months later) he got into trouble with the law for possession.

All those who really think cannabis use should remain illegal for all teenagers can go ahead and positively affirm the statement:

The athletic and legal consequences for Tryann Mathieu were completely reasonable because he was only 20 at the time and cannabis use should have been illegal for him! He should have known better. I hope drug laws remain strictly enforced for teenagers!

Look we can agree. Kids shouldn't smoke pot. After all those detrimental effects of weed made him a terrible football player.