SaltyCajun.com http://www.mkacpas.com/

Notices

Go Back   SaltyCajun.com > General Discussion Forums > General Discussion (Everything Else)

General Discussion (Everything Else) Discuss anything that doesn't belong in any other forums here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2014, 01:44 PM
MathGeek's Avatar
MathGeek MathGeek is offline
King Mackeral
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,931
Cash: 4,552
Default

Not every security technique applies in every situation, but I like and recommend a layered approach to crime prevention, combining physical barriers, surveillance, privacy, dogs and vigilance. Particular care should be exercised when a vehicle or home or other big ticket item is bought or sold. The best place for guns and cash is secured in a locked safe inside an occupied residence or on the immediate person of a security minded individual. I also recommend care when purchasing safes, jewelry, gold, etc. to take care not to leave an easy trail back to the address where the valuables will reside. If a safe must be delivered to a home (thus connected to the address), it is best to bolt it well to a concrete floor and have a locksmith twiddle with the inside of the lock while the owner changes the combination to create a combination that only the owner knows. We also favor gated driveways or communities, especially when vehicles cannot be garaged. Criminals are reluctant to enter gated areas where unknown dogs, surveillance systems, motion detectors, and alarms increase their risks.

The importance of diligence cannot be overstated. We have frequently written down license plate numbers that seemed fishy and taken photographs of unfamiliar vehicles and things that seemed out of place in our quiet neighborhood. Yes, it is usually nothing more than a new service provider or landscaper, but if it turns out to be more, we've got a lot of investigative leads for police.

I might also mention that surveillance will hardly ever raise a red flag when a home or business is being cased unless it is reviewed at regular intervals for things that seem out of place.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2014, 08:00 PM
duckman1911's Avatar
duckman1911 duckman1911 is offline
Sailfish
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Otis
Posts: 4,194
Cash: 5,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MathGeek View Post
Not every security technique applies in every situation, but I like and recommend a layered approach to crime prevention, combining physical barriers, surveillance, privacy, dogs and vigilance. Particular care should be exercised when a vehicle or home or other big ticket item is bought or sold. The best place for guns and cash is secured in a locked safe inside an occupied residence or on the immediate person of a security minded individual. I also recommend care when purchasing safes, jewelry, gold, etc. to take care not to leave an easy trail back to the address where the valuables will reside. If a safe must be delivered to a home (thus connected to the address), it is best to bolt it well to a concrete floor and have a locksmith twiddle with the inside of the lock while the owner changes the combination to create a combination that only the owner knows. We also favor gated driveways or communities, especially when vehicles cannot be garaged. Criminals are reluctant to enter gated areas where unknown dogs, surveillance systems, motion detectors, and alarms increase their risks.

The importance of diligence cannot be overstated. We have frequently written down license plate numbers that seemed fishy and taken photographs of unfamiliar vehicles and things that seemed out of place in our quiet neighborhood. Yes, it is usually nothing more than a new service provider or landscaper, but if it turns out to be more, we've got a lot of investigative leads for police.

I might also mention that surveillance will hardly ever raise a red flag when a home or business is being cased unless it is reviewed at regular intervals for things that seem out of place.
Just make sure that everyone in your small town knows that you are the last M Fr that they want to F with. Has worked well for me so far. Even had a Sheriffs Officer tell one of my neighbors(after an incident)that of all the people on the street you could F with you picked this guy?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-14-2014, 10:50 AM
MathGeek's Avatar
MathGeek MathGeek is offline
King Mackeral
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,931
Cash: 4,552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duckman1911 View Post
Just make sure that everyone in your small town knows that you are the last M Fr that they want to F with. Has worked well for me so far. Even had a Sheriffs Officer tell one of my neighbors(after an incident)that of all the people on the street you could F with you picked this guy?
That's one approach. I prefer flying under the radar. If I'm ever forced to shoot someone, there won't be folks telling the gov't that they knew I was itching to kill someone at the slightest provacation.

A layered approach to security also provides useful evidence and justification should force become necessary. Use of force will much more likely be ruled justifiable if the perpetrator has defeated physical barriers and alarms, eluded dogs, and is caught on surveillance video. Nothing like surveillance video to justify the use of force and show the perp to by lying in their version of events.

Of course, your attorneys should review surveillance video before other parties even know you have it. It is possible it might be in your best interests to lose it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-14-2014, 10:46 PM
duckman1911's Avatar
duckman1911 duckman1911 is offline
Sailfish
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Otis
Posts: 4,194
Cash: 5,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MathGeek View Post
That's one approach. I prefer flying under the radar. If I'm ever forced to shoot someone, there won't be folks telling the gov't that they knew I was itching to kill someone at the slightest provacation.

A layered approach to security also provides useful evidence and justification should force become necessary. Use of force will much more likely be ruled justifiable if the perpetrator has defeated physical barriers and alarms, eluded dogs, and is caught on surveillance video. Nothing like surveillance video to justify the use of force and show the perp to by lying in their version of events.

Of course, your attorneys should review surveillance video before other parties even know you have it. It is possible it might be in your best interests to lose it.
It was a bit more than "the slightest provocation". After a major disagreement I asked/told the guy not to step foot on my property. After that he proceeded to inform me that he would go wherever he wanted and do what he wanted. That is a direct threat and then he stepped onto my property while pointing his finger at me. Yep he ended up on the wrong end of a .45
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-14-2014, 11:55 AM
Goooh's Avatar
Goooh Goooh is offline
Swordfish
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Broussard
Posts: 5,660
Cash: 7,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duckman1911 View Post
Just make sure that everyone in your small town knows that you are the last M Fr that they want to F with. Has worked well for me so far.

One of my favorite posts ever


This poll brought to you by Big League Chew bubble gum
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - [ARG:3 UNDEFINED], Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
SaltyCajun.com logo provided by Bryce Risher

All content, images, designs, and logos are Copyright © 2009-2012,
Salty Cajun, LLC
No unathorized use is permitted
Geo Visitors Map