CCA support vs. STAR participation?

[Natural Light Kid]

Originally Posted by "W"

CCA is scared to stop oyster dredging
CCA is scared to stop erosion
CCA has done ZERO on Lake Calcasieu in 100 years

"ZERO"? Come on man. They may not have done the things On your personal wish list, but would you call banning gil nets nothing? Again, what do you suggest I do in place of CCA?

["W"]

Originally Posted by Natural Light Kid

"ZERO"? Come on man. They may not have done the things On your personal wish list, but would you call banning gil nets nothing? Again, what do you suggest I do in place of CCA?

CCA did not ban gill nets

GCCA which was ran by a whole different breed of people. People who actually fish

[B-Stealth]

Originally Posted by "W"

CCA did not ban gill nets

GCCA which was ran by a whole different breed of people. People who actually fish

Wooooooooow now hold on a minute, different breed of people you say?
Dude you just contradicted yourself big time.
GCCA was started by the Sperry Top Sider, CostaDelMar, Columbia shirt wearing COLLEGE graduates you love to hate.

It's the same damn group of people that you now hate on.

Nostalgia is a hell of a drug.

For the record I support 80% of CCA's actions.

["W"]

Originally Posted by B-Stealth

Wooooooooow now hold on a minute, different breed of people you say?
Dude you just contradicted yourself big time.
GCCA was started by the Sperry Top Sider, CostaDelMar, Columbia shirt wearing COLLEGE graduates you love to hate.

It's the same damn group of people that you now hate on.

Nostalgia is a hell of a drug.

For the record I support 80% of CCA's actions.

Wrong again..... Google it

The group of people who ran GCCA had an agenda for our fisheries not suit and tie with a martini in hand saying lets please one group of people

again the CCA DID NOT BAN GILL NETS

[Natural Light Kid]

Originally Posted by "W"

Wrong again..... Google it

The group of people who ran GCCA had an agenda for our fisheries not suit and tie with a martini in hand saying lets please one group of people

again the CCA DID NOT BAN GILL NETS

Well, if it's on the Internet it has to be true lol. You bash CCA for ignoring questions, but I'm going to ask you AGAIN. What is CCA's "agenda" that you spoke of earlier?

["W"]

Originally Posted by Natural Light Kid

Well, if it's on the Internet it has to be true lol. You bash CCA for ignoring questions, but I'm going to ask you AGAIN. What is CCA's "agenda" that you spoke of earlier?

there agenda is run a huge STAR money making event for 101 days and pay there NON PROFIT VPs and #1s over 100K a year

Support lowing limits or adding limits against Biologist
Supporting limits that were told by Biologist it was never needed
Placing limits like 3Tail that were never needed

[Natural Light Kid]

Originally Posted by "W"

there agenda is run a huge STAR money making event for 101 days and pay there NON PROFIT VPs and #1s over 100K a year

Support lowing limits or adding limits against Biologist
Supporting limits that were told by Biologist it was never needed
Placing limits like 3Tail that were never needed

And thank u for answering.

[Duck Butter]

Originally Posted by "W"

there agenda is run a huge STAR money making event for 101 days and pay there NON PROFIT VPs and #1s over 100K a year

You should really look up the definition of a non-profit. It doesn't mean what you think it means. The NFL was a nonprofit and Roger Goodell brought home $44 million last year

When you pay bananas, you get monkeys. 100k is peanuts to what some of these people could make on their own in the consulting world. You have to pay these people to stay around. It would be nice if you could pay a 22 year old right out of college $45k to run CCA but it isn't gonna happen.

Not defending CCA, just defending non-profit conservation organizations as a whole because a whole lot of mistruths have been spouted off here and lies spread just as fast as the truth.

Once again coastal work is very expensive. It would also be nice if CCA or DU or whomever could just be ran with nothing but unpaid volunteers but that isn't going to happen. I have worked on a few very worthwhile restoration projects in south La where we needed volunteers and every single time the majority of volunteers were not hunters or fishermen but blue-haired ladies usually a birdwatching club or garden club. Every single time. Everyone likes to talk the talk but not walk the walk.

Support or don't support doesn't matter but make sure to read up on a few things about whatever organization you choose before making the decision and remember that NO organization is perfect.

[Top Dawg]

Originally Posted by "W"

Wrong again..... Google it

The group of people who ran GCCA had an agenda for our fisheries not suit and tie with a martini in hand saying lets please one group of people

again the CCA DID NOT BAN GILL NETS

^^^hes right u know. The old members of gcca will have nothing to do with the CCA.

[noodle creek]

Originally Posted by B-Stealth

Wooooooooow now hold on a minute, different breed of people you say?
Dude you just contradicted yourself big time.
GCCA was started by the Sperry Top Sider, CostaDelMar, Columbia shirt wearing COLLEGE graduates you love to hate.

It's the same damn group of people that you now hate on.

Nostalgia is a hell of a drug.

For the record I support 80% of CCA's actions.

Wrong