CCA lets us down again

[all star rod]

Originally Posted by noodle creek

Exactly, technically nothing will change, but 90% of the public thinks it means a free for all.

X2, I never expected Salty Cajun to have so many liberals on the site.

99.9% of the ones wanting this FREE access would have a Major ch ti fit if they owned this land - by having some jack leg passing thru property they own.

[noodle creek]

Originally Posted by all star rod

X2, I never expected Salty Cajun to have so many liberals on the site.

99.9% of the ones wanting this FREE access would have a Major ch ti fit if they owned this land - by having some jack leg passing thru property they own.

Kinda like welfare haha. Landowners spend their own money in a lot of cases to better their land, then people who did zero work get free access.

Kind of an extreme example, but similar in a way. People don't like their hard earned tax money taking care of people who do nothing, but when it comes to the outdoors they want their Obama phone.

["W"]

Originally Posted by noodle creek

Kinda like welfare haha. Landowners spend their own money in a lot of cases to better their land, then people who did zero work get free access.



Kind of an extreme example, but similar in a way. People don't like their hard earned tax money taking care of people who do nothing, but when it comes to the outdoors they want their Obama phone.

No it?s kind of like land owners using state money to serve a purpose on there ?private? land

Because without state water could those marshes Hold the value ?

Answer that question ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[noodle creek]

Originally Posted by "W"

No it?s kind of like land owners using state money to serve a purpose on there ?private? land

Because without state water could those marshes Hold the value ?

Answer that question ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why do they need state water to hold value? I would think property value would stay higher it the property wasn't for public use. if I had a piece of property that had really good fishing, is it worth more if only the landowner can fish or if the public can fish it as well? Why would someone want to buy a piece of property they have access to anyway?

Not every marsh out there is getting crazy help from taxpayer money like everyone tries to say. They probably get more help from DU and Delta and other organizations like those, and no one forces anyone to donate money to them.

["W"]

Originally Posted by noodle creek

Why do they need state water to hold value? I would think property value would stay higher it the property wasn't for public use. if I had a piece of property that had really good fishing, is it worth more if only the landowner can fish or if the public can fish it as well? Why would someone want to buy a piece of property they have access to anyway?



Not every marsh out there is getting crazy help from taxpayer money like everyone tries to say. They probably get more help from DU and Delta and other organizations like those, and no one forces anyone to donate money to them.

All these marshes around us that are tidal feed will never levee off because of the ?Free? tidal flow

It?s not public land it?s public waters


Not sure why it?s hard to comprehend
It?s been like this in Texas , Fla , Miss , Bama ,
All the other coastal states .

I?m mean no one is going to try and take over anyone?s land or try to hunt it
You can not hold with anchor .
Can not touch bottoms .

It does not make a private marsh public it makes tidal waters accessible to the public because State of Louisiana has made clam in its laws
All tidal waters belong to the state


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[noodle creek]

Originally Posted by "W"

All these marshes around us that are tidal feed will never levee off because of the ?Free? tidal flow

It?s not public land it?s public waters


Not sure why it?s hard to comprehend
It?s been like this in Texas , Fla , Miss , Bama ,
All the other coastal states .

I?m mean no one is going to try and take over anyone?s land or try to hunt it
You can not hold with anchor .
Can not touch bottoms .

It does not make a private marsh public it makes tidal waters accessible to the public because State of Louisiana has made clam in its laws
All tidal waters belong to the state


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you've read all my comments you would see where I said there is a big difference between coastal marshes with majority open water vs marshes that are largely land with a few trails, canals to enter ponds off of some natural waterway.

What's done to this point is done, I don't agree with landowners using taxpayer money, but there is nothing anyone can do about that now. Not every canal you find was paid for with your money, and your couple dollars that may have gone to landowners that did have funding lack in comparison to the money they spend themselves I can assure you.

I completely agree that the public should be able to navigate natural waterways if they lead from one public area to another.