![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Boating Talk For discussion of everything related to boats and motors |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() sent from my Galaxy NOTE II |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The biggest reason suzuki has more "pep" is the gear ratio in the lower unit. Yammy has 1.86 gears suzuki has 2.50 gears.....this is a huge factor when it comes to low to mid range performance. The yamaha with the right prop should be faster,but the suzuki will have better holeshot and midrange speeds.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would weight not play a factor in this? With the 200 being a v6 it is signifcantly heavier than the v4 175. That in itself almost negates the 25hp.
Not to mention the much larger price tag of the f200 and the extra fuel economy of the 175. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I have a 250 Suzuki on my 24 triton and Pox has a 250 yammy on his. My boat is faster... |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What is the fuel mileage difference between the zuk and the zuk ss? I really like how quite they are.
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I know a couple guys w the SHO. Speed is rpm. Boat tops out around 62. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is 8-10mph worth 6k-7k more than the suz 175....id say no jmo.....Chas do the guys like those 200 SHOs?
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
200 SHO is the same motor as the 225 and 250....only thing different is the computer.
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Im saying the 200 SHOs on the frontiers? My bad
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Im sure it would be a good match....always best to max the hp rating on a boat.
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Lmao!!! |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Now that's funny right there, I don't care who you are!
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hahahaha... At least I don't wear periwinkle zip up fishing shirts and Easter egg colored shorts...LOL!!!
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder what the cruise speed is at 4000 rpm and the MPG.
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
With my 2 pennies
Id say btw 40-45 and the gas milage would be about 4 4.5 r less bc of the weight. The 200 sho is 505lbs thats alot of weight on the back of the frontier. The suz 175 is 474lbs and getting 4.5-8 crusing sent from my Galaxy NOTE II |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
45@4000 getting 4.5mpg would be awesome!
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.suzukimarine.com/Product%...0Bay%20DF175TX
http://www.yamahaoutboards.com/sites...-04-18_BAY.pdf Not a SHO but still something to compare the Zuk. |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I call a dealer in alb. 200 sho on a 2104
At 3000 rpm. 30mph 6.32 gph and 4.6 mph. At 4000 rpm 40mph 11.9 mpg and 3.4 gph. Wot 2.4 gph sent from my Galaxy NOTE II Last edited by alphaman; 06-13-2013 at 09:05 AM. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
6mpg? That's awesome fuel economy.
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my opinion, the 175 Suzuki is the perfect match for the 2104 Frontier when considering price, speed, fuel efficiency, weight all in one. If you have a need for speed then go with the 200 SHO, this motor is very strong but also a good chunk of change more.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|